I Nuclear Fusion: Radioactive Decay?!

  • Thread starter A M
  • Start date

A M

83
12
Radioactive decay modes always release energy;
but why can't nuclear fusion of light elements be a mode of radioactive decay?
I guess because although such processes are exothermic, we need an inaccessible fairly high amount of energy to overcome the electrostatic repulsion barrier.

But now, I'm facing two more challenging questions:
What exactly is the universally agreed upon definition of radioactive decay?
If nuclear fusion is not a decay mode because we need energy as input for such processes, don't we also need energy for splitting a nucleus in [fission] decay modes? (Like SF, CD, α, p.)

[
Note for mentors: These are not my OP questions, they're only some of my questions by which it is better to start discussion. I'll ask the rest during the discussion ]
Edition: fusion is a decay? what a silly idea I had!
 
Last edited:
I would say a decay is a ##1\to n## process. Of course this is just a label that has nothing to do with physics, so I am not sure what the question is actually about.
 

A M

83
12
I mean a process where 1 particle decays into several (usually 2). That is what the word decay means to me. Fusion starts with two particles (at least).
 

A M

83
12
Yes, I know it's 'decay' after all.
According to nuclear stability, a nucleus is stable if it cant go or hasn't gone under radioactive decay.
It means that stability is not the ability of a nucleus not to change into other nuclei?
 
Sure, “this particle is stable” does usually not mean “this particle can not undergo interactions” if that is your question.
 

A M

83
12
Iron-56 & nickle-62 have the highest binding energies per nucleon; meaning that if they go under a nuclear reaction changing them to other nuclei, the process is endothermic and thus very unlikely.
So they are usually known as the most stable nuclei.
But according to what you said, how can binding energy per nucleon be a parameter upon which stability of stable nuclei depends?
 
I am having the feeling we are just discussing nomenclature here. Is there an actual physics question this is building up to? Do you want to as about the use of the word stability in a particular context? Then it would be nice to provide some reference.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Nuclear Fusion: Radioactive Decay?!" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Nuclear Fusion: Radioactive Decay?!

  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
625
Replies
6
Views
924
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
69K
Replies
9
Views
22K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top