Why is the CMB relatively uniform?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hewiiitt-
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Cmb Uniform
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
hewiiitt-
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This might be a stupid question due to a simplistic under standing of the Big Bang. But why is the CMB uniform across the sky. Why is it not sognificantly higher on one side from the other. Surely if the Big Bang was a point then everything would eminate from that point resulting in one side that was closer having higher reading. Thanks for any answers. Sorry if it is a stupid question.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and hewiiitt-
jfizzix said:
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.

Thanks for the quick response
 
jfizzix said:
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.

Just thinking though for this to out run gravity wouldn't things have had to move faster than the speed of light.
 
hewiiitt- said:
Surely if the Big Bang was a point ...
This is by far the most common misconception is the early study of cosmology and is promulgated by pop-science making exactly that false statement. The "big bang singularity" was NOT a point. It happened everywhere at once. The "big bang theory" doesn't even include the singularity but instead is a discussion of what happened from about one Plank Time after the singularity to today. Contrary to the totally incorrect statements you see everywhere in pop-science, "singularity" does not mean "point" it means "the place where our math model breaks down and gives nonphysical results and we don't know WHAT is/was going on"