Why is the D-D nuclear fusion reaction unlikely despite having a higher Q value?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The D-D nuclear fusion reaction, represented by the equation ^2H+^2H → ^4He + γ, is unlikely despite its high Q value of 23.8 MeV, which exceeds both neutron and proton separation energies. This counterintuitive conclusion arises because the reaction involves photon emission and operates via the weak interaction, making it rare compared to the more probable D-T reaction (^2H+^3H → ^4He + n) with a Q value of 17.6 MeV. The latter reaction benefits from a larger phase space and the absence of photon emission, enhancing its likelihood. Additionally, reactions like ^2H+^1H → ^3He + γ are part of the proton-proton chain, despite their own rarity due to weak interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion reactions
  • Familiarity with Q values in nuclear physics
  • Knowledge of weak and strong nuclear interactions
  • Basic concepts of phase space in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of nuclear fusion in stars
  • Study the differences between weak and strong nuclear interactions
  • Explore the role of phase space in determining reaction probabilities
  • Learn about the proton-proton chain and its significance in stellar energy production
USEFUL FOR

Students of nuclear physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the mechanisms of stellar fusion reactions.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I'm having trouble understand a passage in our book.
The author claims that the reaction
##^2H+^2H \to ^4He + \gamma##
is unlikely since the ##Q## value is large (##23.8## MeV) which happens to be greater than both the neutron and proton separation energies.

This seem very counter intuitive to me. Shouldn't a large ##Q## value rather make the reaction more probably?

We also have the D-T reaction
##^2H+^3H \to ^4He +n## with ##Q=17.6##
that for some reason is more probable but I really don't see the difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3He + n and 3H + p are more likely as they don't involve the emission of a photon and work via the strong interaction only. They should also have a larger phase space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
mfb said:
3He + n and 3H + p are more likely as they don't involve the emission of a photon and work via the strong interaction only.
That makes some sense but then I wonder why
##^2H+ \; ^1H \to \; ^3He + \gamma##
and
##2 \; ^3 He \to \; ^4He +2 \; ^1H+ \gamma##
are part of the p-p chain as opposed to for example
##^2H+ \; ^1H \to \; ^3H+p##
Shouldn't these by the same reasoning be unlikely?
 
Your last equation creates a neutron out of nowhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Vanadium 50 said:
Your last equation creates a neutron out of nowhere.
That's embarrassing,I tried to come up with an example.

But for the other two reactions is the reasoning here that they are indeed unlikely but there just isn't anything more probably around either? Not that gives a reaction chain with enough released energy to be a significant part of the powering of a star in any case.
 
Your first two equations involve the weak interaction. This makes them rare.
 
@Vanadium 50: None of the reactions involve the weak interaction.

2H + 1H -> 3He + photon is the only reaction that is possible with those hydrogen nuclei.
3He + 3He -> 4He + 1H + 1H can work without photons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
You're right. I looked at 3He and thought "tritium". Dumb of me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K