watermelonisnice
Why is the Eiffel Tower a popular tourist destination in Paris, is it a unique structure? I want to know everyone's opinion.
Why is the Eiffel Tower such a popular tourist destination?
- Thread starter watermelonisnice
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Tower
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
14 replies · 3K views
Discussion
Science Advisor
- 3,510
- 1,073
Because it is a massive tower in the middle of Paris...
It is not actually that tall or big by modern standards (there are taller skyscrapers), but keep in mind that it is ~150 years old and back then it must have been incredible.
Also, it IS very impressive if you are there in person; it is hard to get the sense of scale when you just see it on photos or TV...it is very, very big and tall.
It is not actually that tall or big by modern standards (there are taller skyscrapers), but keep in mind that it is ~150 years old and back then it must have been incredible.
Also, it IS very impressive if you are there in person; it is hard to get the sense of scale when you just see it on photos or TV...it is very, very big and tall.
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
I'm not sure this is a matter of opinion, but rather a matter of history. It was built for the World's Fair - it is, by design, a tourist attraction.watermelonisnice said:
- 29,891
- 21,764
It's not unique, as there is also the Blackpool Tower:
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
I wouldn't mistake that for the Eiffel Tower.PeroK said:
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 35,014
- 21,725
Is nobody amazed that this has stood for almost a century and a half and was made by the same people who gave us Peugeot?
256bits
Gold Member
- 4,284
- 2,297
Same people who made the Statue of Liberty I think.
Science Advisor
2025 Award
- 17,248
- 10,707
It is the curve of the Eiffel Tower structure that attracts the positive attention.
The same is true in Sydney with the Harbour Bridge and the Opera House,
or a suspension bridge like the Golden Gate.
The Gherkin in London will be admired, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_St_Mary_Axe
but the Shard will not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shard
The same is true in Sydney with the Harbour Bridge and the Opera House,
or a suspension bridge like the Golden Gate.
The Gherkin in London will be admired, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_St_Mary_Axe
but the Shard will not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 35,014
- 21,725
256bits said:
Literally. While Bartholdi was the artist, the engineer who made sure it didn't fall down was a fellow named Gustave Eiffel.
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 35,014
- 21,725
Baluncore said:
You mean it's supposed to look like that? Oh. My.
I guess it's true. Doctors bury their mistakes, but all an architect can do is plant ivy.
Klystron
Gold Member
- 1,264
- 1,980
When the Tower was built some serious (and numerous kooky) people sought to tap into "geomantic currents" thought to be swirling within the Earth. Similar factions thought Le Tour and the Paris underground construction either sought, relied upon or disturbed said currents.
Electromagnetics was poorly understood then. Also see dowsing.
Italian semiotics professor Umberto Eco explores this aspect of Eiffel Tower fame in his history textbooks and novel "Foucault's Pendulum".
Electromagnetics was poorly understood then. Also see dowsing.
Italian semiotics professor Umberto Eco explores this aspect of Eiffel Tower fame in his history textbooks and novel "Foucault's Pendulum".
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,197
- 10,328
I think so too.f95toli said:
I agree. When you are there in person it is huge. Just being under the tower is a dizzying feeling.f95toli said:
Here is a panoramic view from underneath the tower on Google Maps.
Last edited:
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 4,198
- 2,391
The difficulties of its construction and handling of steel pieces and rivets at that extreme height, as well as the challenges of elevators for construction materials and later for passengers, have always amazed me.watermelonisnice said:
Please, see:
Eiffel Tower - Wikipedia
Elevator Systems of the Eiffel Tower, 1889, Robert M. Vogel (scientificlib.com)
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 35,014
- 21,725
It was almost 40 years before a larger structure (the Chrysler Building in NYC) was constructed. But Paris is not a very "tall" city - in that respect it is more like Washington DC than New York. This is especially so in the 7th and 16th arrondissements around the tower. So it looks even bigger in context.
Science Advisor
2025 Award
- 17,248
- 10,707
According to the French Standards of the day, the original long-wave time signals broadcast from the Eiffel Tower were not Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), they were actually “delayed Paris Time”, delayed by about 9 minutes and 21 seconds.
The subconscious plays an interesting role in history. The Statue of Liberty was certainly an excellent investment, it has now helped liberate the French twice. It seems the Eiffel Tower was so attractive that it resulted in a little unpleasantness, mainly between 1914-18 and 1939-45.
Since the Fernsehturm was built in Berlin, the attractive forces have been better balanced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernsehturm_Berlin
The subconscious plays an interesting role in history. The Statue of Liberty was certainly an excellent investment, it has now helped liberate the French twice. It seems the Eiffel Tower was so attractive that it resulted in a little unpleasantness, mainly between 1914-18 and 1939-45.
Since the Fernsehturm was built in Berlin, the attractive forces have been better balanced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernsehturm_Berlin