Why Is the Expected Value a Linear Operator in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KastorPhys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
KastorPhys
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In a Quantum Mechanics Class, my tutor had shown me that
the variance Δa2

Δa2 = < ( a - < a > )2 >
= < a2 - 2 a < a > + < a >2 >
= < a2 > - 2 < a >< a > + < a >2
= < a2 > - 2 < a >2 + < a >2
= < a2 > - < a >2

and my questions are

i) why, in step 3,

< x - y + z > will become < x > - < y > + < z > ?

ii)why, also in step 3, the middle term,

< -2 a < a > > will finally become -2 < a >2 ?

Is it mean that < a < a > > = < a > < a > = < a >2 ?? but why?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
KastorPhys said:
In a Quantum Mechanics Class, my tutor had shown me that
the variance Δa2

Δa2 = < ( a - < a > )2 >
= < a2 - 2 a < a > + < a >2 >
= < a2 > - 2 < a >< a > + < a >2
= < a2 > - 2 < a >2 + < a >2
= < a2 > - < a >2

and my questions are

i) why, in step 3,

< x - y + z > will become < x > - < y > + < z > ?

ii)why, also in step 3, the middle term,

< -2 a < a > > will finally become -2 < a >2 ?

Is it mean that < a < a > > = < a > < a > = < a >2 ?? but why?

Thanks!
I'm not familiar with your notation. One definition of the variance of a random variable X (from Wikipedia - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance) is:
##Var(X) = E[(X - \mu)^2]##
Here E[X] means the expected value of X.

The right side of the equation above can be expanded to yield
##Var(X) = E[(X - E[X])^2] \\
= E[X^2 - 2XE[X] + (E[X])^2] \\
= E[X^2 - 2E[X] E[X] +(E[X])^2] \\
= E[X^2] - (E[X])^2##
 
In all three questions the answer is the expected value is a linear operator. For an observable ##A## the expected value is defined as
##\langle A \rangle _{\phi} := \langle \phi | \, A \,| \phi \rangle##. Suppose that ##A## and ##B## are observables (mathematically they are operators on some Hilbert space), and let ##\alpha## and ##\beta## be complex numbers. Then
##\langle \alpha A + \beta B \rangle_\phi = \langle \phi | \alpha A + \beta B | \phi \rangle = \langle \phi | \alpha A | \phi \rangle + \langle \phi | \beta B | \phi \rangle =\alpha \langle \phi | A | \phi \rangle + \beta \langle \phi | B | \phi \rangle = \alpha \langle A \rangle_\phi + \beta \langle A \rangle_\phi##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K