Why is the infinite Cartesian product of [0,1] with itself not countably based?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Extropy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the infinite Cartesian product of the interval [0,1] with itself, particularly focusing on why this space does not have a countable base in the context of topology. Participants explore concepts related to second countability and the implications of infinite products in topology.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the infinite Cartesian product of [0,1] would have a countable base, given that [0,1] itself does not have one.
  • Another participant suggests that a specific collection of intervals could serve as a countable base, but acknowledges that this would not apply to infinite products.
  • It is noted that R^n with the usual topology is second countable for finite n, but the situation changes as n approaches infinity.
  • Participants discuss the distinction between countable and uncountable products, indicating that a countable product is second countable while an uncountable product is not even first countable.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding the nature of neighborhoods in the product topology and how the uncountability of [0,1] leads to contradictions in assuming a countable local base.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the countability of the infinite Cartesian product of [0,1]. There is no consensus on whether the space is second countable, as some argue it is not due to the uncountable nature of the product, while others provide reasoning that suggests it could be second countable under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of applying concepts of countability to infinite products and the specific conditions under which these properties hold. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of bases and the implications of the product topology.

Extropy
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A question about bases

I have a question as to why a particular space does not have a countable base. The space is the infinite Cartesian product of the interval [0,1] with the usual topology, with itself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
?? The interval [0, 1], with the usual topology, itself, does not have a countable base. why would you expect an infinite Cartesian product of such things to have a countable base?
 
Now you've got me confused, sorry.
It's been a while, but isn't
[tex]\{ (q - 1/n, q + 1/n) \mid q \in \mathbb{Q}, n \in \mathbb{N} \} \cap [0, 1][/tex]
one?

(which still wouldn't work, as for any finite product this is still countable, but for an infinite product it's not).

Probably you should / could / would have to prove that the space is not second countable.
 
Last edited:
R^n with the usual topology is second countable.
 
For all [itex]n \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], yes. But what about [itex]n \to \infty[/itex]?
 
CompuChip said:
For all [itex]n \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], yes. But what about [itex]n \to \infty[/itex]?
It's still second countable: a countable basis is the collection of products of the form [itex]\prod_n X_n[/itex] where X_n is an interval with rational endpoints for finitely many n and X_n = R.

And [0,1] does have a countable base for its usual topology -- after all, it's a separable metric space.

Now as to why [0,1]x[0,1]x... isn't second countable, well, how big of a product are we talking about? If it's a countable product then it is second countable, but if it's an uncountable product then it's not even first countable.
 
Now as to why [0,1]x[0,1]x... isn't second countable, well, how big of a product are we talking about? If it's a countable product then it is second countable, but if it's an uncountable product then it's not even first countable.

Well, as big as a product to make it uncountable, if there is such a product. Could you explain how the uncountable product of [0,1] with itself is not countable?
 
(You mean second countable.)

Let's take the product of [0,1] with itself [0,1] times, i.e. [0,1]^[0,1], as prototypical example. This is just another way to talk about the set of functions from [0,1] into [0,1]. A nbhd of a function f in [0,1]^[0,1] (in the product topology) is given by a product of open sets in [0,1] all but finitely many of which are [0,1]. We can picture these nbhds as wiggle room for f, where we can restrict the wiggling at only finitely many points in [0,1].

Now suppose {B_i} is a countable local base at f, and write B_i = [itex]\prod_{a \in [0,1]} U_{i,a}[/itex], where all but finitely many of the U_{i,a}'s are [0,1]. Now because [0,1] is uncountable, we know there exists an a* in [0,1] such that U_{i,a*} = [0,1] for all i. But this means we can't restrict the wiggle space of f at a*, which is a contradiction. More formally, the nbhd [itex]\prod_{a \in [0,1]} G_{a}[/itex], where G_{a*} is strictly smaller than [0,1] (but big enough to contain f(a*)) and G_a = [0,1] for all other a, of f doesn't contain any B_i. So {B_i} can't possibly be a local base at f.

So [0,1]^[0,1] isn't first countable, and consequently not second countable.

This might be too much to swallow if you're not comfortable with the product topology and viewing Cartesian products as sets of functions, but if you are, try putting my words above into picture and the details will write themselves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K