Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why media is not a resource for Biology

  1. Oct 3, 2007 #1

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This is a link to a comic page that changes daily. You want to look at the one for Wed Oct 3, 2007, which is when I'm posting this.
    http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/

    The reason I put this up in Biology is because a lot of posts claiming something or another based on what was in the Washington Post or the Manchester Guardian routinely appear here in Biology. It ain't science solely because it's in the newpaper.

    Wikipedia sometimes has a problem like this - but it's because of spammers (can't think of a better word) gunking something up. Or because of a person posting his own point of view, one not shared by any other scientific researchers.

    Because of the 'fair and balanced' thing, what most researchers find ridiculous
    will get equal time with solid science. Joe TV watcher cannot tell the difference.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Why media is not a resource for Biology
  1. Toxicology Resources (Replies: 1)

Loading...