Why not make a forum here specifically for word problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycmathguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proposal to create a dedicated forum for word problems spanning prealgebra to precalculus, aimed at providing extra practice for members. Concerns arise about the feasibility of curating such content and the potential burden on moderators, suggesting that a focus on quality over quantity is essential. Some participants argue that dividing problems by type rather than topic may not be practical. The conversation also touches on the nature of problem-solving and the challenges associated with word problems. Ultimately, the idea remains open for consideration, pending input from site leadership.
nycmathguy
I would like to post lots of word problems covering prealgebra through precalculus as extra practice for members. By doing so, members do not have to search online for questions to work on.

Questions:

1. Why not make a forum here SPECIFICALLY for word problems?

2. If this sounds like a good idea, where can I post my word problems?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fundamental issue is “why not other problems?” Curating problem sets would be a change in direction for the site and would probably overwhelm the moderators.

At the end of the day, it is up to our dear leader @Greg Bernhardt
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
Comment 1: "I need my very own section!" Indeed.
Comment 2: It's about quality more than quantity. You will get more out of it if you put more into it.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
I vote no.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, hutchphd, Doc Al and 3 others
What about:

Must be essential (8, 8)

I anti-disestablish, you anti-disestablish, he/she/it anti-disestablishes ... (7, 11)

Pessimistic and more insensitive (8, 6)

The answers are all things to do with mathematics.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
What about:

Must be essential? (8, 8)

I anti-disestablish, you anti-disestablish, he/she/it anti-disestablishes ... (7, 11)

Pessimistic and more insensitive (8, 6)

The answers are all things to do with mathematics.
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
 
caz said:
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
These are cryptic, crossword clues. Not for the literal minded!
 
caz said:
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
It's a math puzzle, and I'm failing so far. Give me a minute...
 
PeroK said:
These are cryptic, crossword clues. Not for the literal minded!
Doh! o0)
 
  • #10
Comment 3: Dividing problems up by "word" and "not-so-word" makes much less sense than dividing them by topic.
Comment 4: Is this a word problem? "Show that at least one element of a Pythagorean triple is divisible by 4." Is this? "Walter walks into a bar, and is told he can get a free beer if at least one element of a Pythagorean triple is divisible by 4. Does he get a free beer? Why or why not?"
Comment 5: We just went through a long thread where you claimed that your difficulty with word problems wasn't on you - no, it was entirely the fault of the writers of these problems. Given this premise (which I don't think has merit), what would be the point of such a section?
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, phinds, hutchphd and 2 others
  • #11
PeroK said:
I anti-disestablish, you anti-disestablish, he/she/it anti-disestablishes ... (7, 11)
You can have a star for that one.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #12
This won't work. There have been four major events in the last century which changed our acceptability fundamentally

1934 - N. Bourbaki
1981 - MTV
1984 - LaTeX
1992 - Html

and notably from reading stuff into visualizing content in less and less time.

People nowadays are more than ever used to veni, vidi, vici. They expect to see what it is all about rather than reading long texts and filtering the relevant information on their own. I even refuse to comment on uploaded pictures, that have often to be remastered: download, orientation, zoom, contrast, decoding unreadable handwriting - neither of which I want to do. LaTeX is also important because it allows getting the crucial information at one glimpse and avoids the confusion linear notation usually envokes.
Vanadium 50 said:
Comment 2: It's about quality more than quantity. You will get more out of it if you put more into it.
is the crucial point, or as I like to take it:

Comment 3 6: Why should I put more effort in an answer than a student put in his question?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #13
fresh_42 said:
1934 - N. Bourbaki
1981 - MTV
1984 - LaTeX
1992 - Html
While I am not a fan of Bourbaki style, I would not have described it as negative to civilization.
 
  • #14
PeroK said:
Pessimistic and more insensitive (8, 6)
I might give that one a star too, but I realized it wouldn't change anything.
 
  • #15
caz said:
While I am not a fan of Bourbaki style, I would not have described it as negative to civilization.
Have I? I don't think so.
 
  • #16
fresh_42 said:
Have I? I don't think so.
MTV killed albums.
Latex does not save time (20 fast drafts instead of two slow ones) and since authors are now doing typesetting promotes the proliferation of publications.
Html enabled the countless pathologies of the internet.
Boubaki (please fill in)
 
  • #17
caz said:
MTV killed albums.
Latex does not save time (20 fast drafts instead of two slow ones) and since authors are now doing typesetting promotes the proliferation of publications.
Html enabled the countless pathologies of the internet.
Boubaki (please fill in)
I could answer with a list of positive consequences of each, and those were the ones I had in mind. I appreciate every single one of them. However, this might be a little too off-topic.
 
  • #18
caz said:
The fundamental issue is “why not other problems?” Curating problem sets would be a change in direction for the site and would probably overwhelm the moderators.

At the end of the day, it is up to our dear leader @Greg Bernhardt
Ok. It was just an idea.
 
  • #19
Vanadium 50 said:
Comment 1: "I need my very own section!" Indeed.
Comment 2: It's about quality more than quantity. You will get more out of it if you put more into it.
It was just an idea.
 
  • #20
PeroK said:
What about:

Must be essential (8, 8)

I anti-disestablish, you anti-disestablish, he/she/it anti-disestablishes ... (7, 11)

Pessimistic and more insensitive (8, 6)

The answers are all things to do with mathematics.
English, please?
 
  • #21
nycmathguy said:
English, please?
That is English. @Ibix has solved two of them.

Hint for the middle one: what do you call it when you run through the different forms of a verb like that?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Ibix and berkeman
  • #22
PeroK said:
That is English. @Ibix has solved two of them.

Hint for the middle one: what do you call it when you run through the different forms of a verb like that?
Here's a better one:

Why did George Washington cross the Delaware River?

[Post edited by a Mentor to remove all caps (yelling)]
 
  • #23
nycmathguy said:
Here's a better one:

Why did George Washington cross the Delaware River?

[Post edited by a Mentor to remove all caps (yelling)]
To get to the other side?
 
  • Like
Likes nycmathguy
  • #24
Here's another one for anyone who is still interested:

Dinosaur searches for food? (6, 5)
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
To get to the other side?
Bingo!

Now, answer my word problems thread.
 
  • #26
nycmathguy said:
Now, answer my word problems thread please.
There, I fixed it for you. :wink:
 
  • #27
berkeman said:
There, I fixed it for you. :wink:
Fixed what?
 
  • Sad
Likes berkeman
  • #28
I think the thread has run its course and it's time to close it.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
383
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
5
Replies
212
Views
13K
Back
Top