Why Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the book "Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores" by Lord and Novick, published in 1968. The use of the term 'statistical' raises questions about the nature of the theories presented, suggesting they may not be purely psychological. The comparison to Newton's "Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica" highlights the distinction between mathematical and physical theories, indicating that the significance of Lord and Novick's work may be less clear. The absence of an explanation for the title within the book leaves readers to speculate on the authors' intentions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical methodologies in psychology
  • Familiarity with the historical context of psychological testing
  • Knowledge of foundational works in psychometrics
  • Basic comprehension of mathematical theories in scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical impact of "Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores" on psychometrics
  • Explore the relationship between statistical methods and psychological theories
  • Investigate other foundational texts in psychometrics and their implications
  • Examine current statistical techniques used in mental testing and their evolution
USEFUL FOR

Psychologists, statisticians, educators, and researchers interested in the intersection of statistical methods and psychological assessment will benefit from this discussion.

Ad VanderVen
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
In 1968, Lord and Novick published a book called Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. I wonder why they used the adjective 'statistical'. Does this suggest that the theories mentioned are not psychological theories and, if so, what could be the meaning of such theories?
In 1968, Lord and Novick published a book called Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. I wonder why they used the adjective 'statistical'. Does this suggest that the theories mentioned are not psychological theories and, if so, what could be the meaning of such theories? Should these theories be regarded as a stepping stone to psychological theories? It almost resembles Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Loosely translated, his book could also have been called A Mathematical Theory of Physical Measurements, which would suggest that the theory proposed is not physical, but purely mathematical. Which would also be somewhat true, because Newton had no idea what gravity actually was. He also didn't know why his so-called three laws of nature worked. Yet no one doubts the importance of his research. In the case of the book Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, the importance of that research seems less clear.

Literature

Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison Wesley.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you read the book? Did the authors discuss their choice of title in the book? If not, then it will be next to impossible for anyone else to divine what they intended by their word choice.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Yes, I've read most of the book and have since developed my own statistical theory for response times to simple mental tasks. I didn't think Lord and Novick mentioned anywhere in the book why they used the adjective 'statistical'.
 
If the authors didn't say, then anyone would just be guessing, and I think you probably have a better basis on which to guess than anyone else here would. You should just go with your impression.
 
I took a quick look. It's filled with statistics and statistical techniques.
 

Similar threads

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Graduate Defining the membership relation in set theory?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Graduate The Blessings of Dimensionality and Hilbert's 6th Problem
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad What Shapes Can Extra Dimensions Take in String Theory?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Graduate Macroscopic systems in the quantum theory book by Asher Peres
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
What defines a truly smart person?
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Graduate What exactly is a "rare event"? (Poisson point process)
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Admissions Honest opinions and advice on Statement of Purpose requested
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate MOND Theory Primer: Stacy McGaugh's Research Program Explored
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Graduate How Do Various Theories Define Information Through Entropy?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K