julian said:
I get what you were saying. And yes these are the questions that would be need to be answered when coming up with a definition of your biscuit. And there are many ways of defining a biscuit.
I was assuming this definition was already in place and that you started with 28 of them.
I am not trying to be difficult. But you claimed that conservation of the number of biscuits follows from conservation of mass.
The mass of the flour, milk, salt, lard, etc that go into a batch of 28 biscuits is indeed close to the mass of the resulting biscuits. But you started with no biscuits and ended with 28.
The mass of the 28 biscuits hot from the oven will be similar (though not identical!) to the mass of the biscuits that you eventually eat. Yet any mass discrepancy does not alter the number of biscuits you have.
The mass of the biscuits you eat can be accounted for if you weight yourself before and after the meal. Yet you started with 28 biscuits and ended with fewer objects which would be regarded by anyone as a "biscuit".
And yes, I am sure that you are right that the folks you are arguing with are idiots who think that they have "disproved subtraction" (whatever that means). But there are a couple little quotes that I like to use:
"If you find yourself arguing with an idiot, chances are good that he is doing the same"
"Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience".