Wiki article on Unruh radiation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Unruh effect, specifically addressing inaccuracies in the Wikipedia article regarding the visibility of the Rindler horizon. Participants clarify that the Rindler horizon cannot be "visible" to observers, as no signals can reach them from beyond this horizon. Additionally, the standard derivation of the Unruh effect requires the quantum field to be in a vacuum state, which is disrupted by the presence of a refrigerated accelerating wall. The latest version of the Wikipedia article has been updated to correct these inaccuracies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Unruh effect and its implications in quantum field theory.
  • Familiarity with Rindler coordinates and horizons in the context of general relativity.
  • Knowledge of thermal boundary conditions in quantum fields.
  • Basic principles of inertial and non-inertial observers in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the Unruh effect in quantum field theory.
  • Study Rindler coordinates and their significance in general relativity.
  • Explore thermal boundary conditions and their impact on quantum fields.
  • Investigate the implications of inertial versus non-inertial frames in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of quantum field theory and general relativity.

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,443
Reaction score
1,608
Wikki says the following with respect to Unruh effect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unruh_effect&oldid=563459371

The Unruh effect could only be seen when the Rindler horizon is visible. If a refrigerated accelerating wall is placed between the particle and the horizon, at fixed Rindler coordinate \rho_0, the thermal boundary condition for the field theory at \rho_0 is the temperature of the wall. By making the positive \rho side of the wall colder, the extension of the wall's state to \rho>\rho_0 is also cold. In particular, there is no thermal radiation from the acceleration of the surface of the Earth, nor for a detector accelerating in a circle[citation needed], because under these circumstances there is no Rindler horizon in the field of view.

I'm not at all sure it's accurate though.

I seem to be getting myself more confused as I try to think about this, starting with the issue of whether the temperature of a classical fluid in an Einstein's elevator should actually be uniform with height or not.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pervect said:
I'm not at all sure it's accurate though.

That's a wise policy to have with respect to Wikipedia articles. 😉

First, to say the the Rindler horizon is "visible" is a missatement, since by definition no light or any other signal from the horizon can reach an observer above the horizon. At any rate, there is certainly nothing in the standard derivation of the Unruh effect that says anything about where the observer is relative to their Rindler horizon.

Second, the standard derivation of the Unruh effect assumes that the quantum field starts out in the state that an inertial observer would see as the vacuum state. Obviously this condition can't be met if you put something like a "refrigerated accelerating wall" between the observer and their Rindler horizon.

So I would say that the quoted language is indeed not accurate.

For what it's worth, it looks like the most current version of this Wiki article (as of the date of this post) no longer has this confusing language:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unruh_effect&oldid=893878764
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K