Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the implications of pursuing a master's degree in Physics versus a master's in Mechanical Engineering (ME) for job opportunities. Participants explore the potential career paths and licensing issues associated with each degree, particularly in the context of a background in Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET).
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that pursuing any higher education will narrow job opportunities, as advanced degrees are often required for specific careers.
- There is a viewpoint that a master's in Physics (MSc) is more general but may be in less demand compared to a master's in Mechanical Engineering.
- One participant notes that while physics majors can transition into engineering roles, job descriptions often favor candidates with the specific degree required.
- Concerns are raised about the ability to transition from a MET bachelor's degree to a master's in ME, particularly regarding differences in fundamental coursework and acceptance criteria.
- Some participants mention that obtaining a Professional Engineer (PE) license is not necessary for most engineering jobs, although licensing requirements vary by jurisdiction.
- One participant expresses regret about their choice of a MET degree, citing perceived limitations compared to a traditional ME degree.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing opinions on the value and demand of a master's in Physics versus a master's in Mechanical Engineering. There is no consensus on which degree would definitively broaden job opportunities, and concerns about transitioning from MET to ME remain unresolved.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the importance of understanding the specific requirements for master's programs and the potential need for additional coursework to meet those requirements. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the job market's reception of various degrees.