Will Aquaculture Save Us from Worldwide Famine?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxS
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential of aquaculture as a solution to global food shortages exacerbated by exponential population growth. Since 1978, the human population has outpaced food production capabilities, leading to widespread famine, particularly in developing countries. Aquaculture, while promising, presents challenges such as the need for a sustainable food chain, exemplified by the codfish's dependency on shrimp and plankton. The conversation also touches on the implications of government policies on food distribution and population control, particularly in countries like China and the USA.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aquaculture principles and practices
  • Knowledge of food chain dynamics in marine ecosystems
  • Familiarity with global population growth trends and their impact on food security
  • Awareness of governmental policies affecting agriculture and food distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research sustainable aquaculture practices and technologies
  • Explore the impact of global population policies on food production
  • Investigate the role of government intervention in agricultural markets
  • Learn about the ecological implications of fish farming and food chain sustainability
USEFUL FOR

Policy makers, environmental scientists, agricultural experts, and anyone interested in food security and sustainable practices in aquaculture.

  • #61
The Smoking Man said:
When you talk about things like this I am reminded of parts of Southern Ontario. A lot of tobacco was grown there and it provided a steady income for the farmers. HOWEVER, when the taxation, the health scares and all the rest were put into place and demand fell, the tobacco farmers were the ones effected the most.

I know one tobacco farmer out near Cambridge, ON. I recall him telling me that he doesn't grow tobacco year after year in the same fields, as the soil can't sustain it. He had to rotate crops, although I can't remember now what else he grew. I did however see enough tobacco to keep a dedicated smoker satisfied for the rest of his life.

Incidentally, the majority of his tobacco was going to be sold to China.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #62
MaxS said:
1978 was the year the two rates crossed. Before that point, we had the ability (but did not do so) to distribute equally among all of Earth's population enough food so that no one would have to die of starvation. Since that date however, Earth's population has eclipsed our ability to grow crops (including farm animals). What this means is that even if we tried to distribute enough food for everyone to eat, many people would still have to starve to death because there just isn't enough to go around.
I would like to see the basis for this conclusion. Where is this coming from, a book? The web? What are your references?

GM crops weren't even around in 1978. GM foods are controversial, but you cannot say that the picture you have presented is accurate to the extent that it does not take GM crops into account, one way or another. (That's just one example.)
 
  • #63
vanesch said:
There is a very natural solution to the problem of reduced living standards (let alone famin) reaching highly develloped democracies: they go to war ! Democracies cannot stand lowering living standards, it makes them elect fascist rulers, who blame the "others" for all the misery.
Now, war is the "market response" to famine, and would regulate the problem ; the problem now is that with all the sophisticated armament around, the problem might be regulated once and for all!
There are examples to what you have posted. There are counterexamples as well. For example, after the fall of the Soviet system the living standards fell (and income distribution probably worsened) but Russia didn't go to war.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 895 ·
30
Replies
895
Views
99K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K