russ_watters said:No. You are really too fixated on natural disasters.
This is nonsense. Scientists can't respond to an issue that doesn't exist. You're letting your paranoia control you. That's unfortunate for you, but we can neither humor your paranoia nor provide you with the help you need to adequately deal with it.The_Absolute said:I am uncomfortable with the fact that even modern science and today's top notch Ph.D. scientists are completely stumped by the sudden inexplicable explosion of natural disasters which seems to have started around 2000-2001.
A Malthusian catastrophe is a theoretical event in which population growth outpaces the availability of resources, leading to widespread famine, disease, and social unrest.
The 21st century is a concern for a potential Malthusian catastrophe because the world's population is expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, and the demand for resources such as food, water, and energy is increasing at a rapid rate.
Factors that contribute to a potential Malthusian catastrophe in the 21st century include overpopulation, depletion of natural resources, climate change, and unequal distribution of resources.
While there are regions of the world that are experiencing resource scarcity and food insecurity, there is no evidence that a Malthusian catastrophe is currently happening on a global scale. However, if efforts are not made to address population growth and resource management, it could lead to a catastrophic event in the future.
Preventing a Malthusian catastrophe in the 21st century will require a combination of efforts, including sustainable resource management, population control measures, and addressing issues of inequality and poverty. It will also require cooperation and action from governments, organizations, and individuals around the world.