News Will the 21st Century See a Major Global Military Conflict?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vanesch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the likelihood of a major military conflict in the 21st century, particularly World War III, and its potential origins. Participants express skepticism about the probability of a large-scale war between major powers due to economic globalization and interdependence, while acknowledging the risk of local conflicts escalating into broader violence. Concerns are raised about the ongoing tensions between nuclear-armed nations like India and Pakistan, as well as the socio-economic divides that could lead to unrest. The impact of religious extremism and the potential for terrorism are also highlighted as significant threats. Overall, while a major conflict seems unlikely in the near future, the evolving geopolitical landscape could change perceptions and realities by 2100.
  • #61
Count Iblis said:
And the Soviets were involved in Afghanistan way before the invasion.
So what?
Count Iblis said:
The Soviets did not invade with the purpose of destroying Afghanistan. They saw a threat from radical Islamists. They also thought that the policies of the president were a threat. The Soviet invasion did not work for a many reasons.
Most of that is false, but even if all true so what? The topic at the moment is the historical fact that Afghanistan was in many ways a modernizing country prior to the Soviet invasion, and that the Soviets did great damage to the country upon invasion. You called that nonsense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Most of that is false, but even if all true so what? The topic at the moment is the historical fact that Afghanistan was in many ways a modernizing country prior to the Soviet invasion, and that the Soviets did great damage to the country upon invasion. You called that nonsense.

It is not false at all, but to see that you may have to ditch some biased US sources. The Soviet invasion did end up doing a lot of damage, but the reason for that had a lot to do with the Western support for Islamic extremists in that country (the so-called "freedom fighters").

You quoted some examples of positive developments in Afghanistan, but you left out some crucial facts about Ismalic extremists gaining power. You cannot have a modern democratic society, if some (small) fraction of the population does not want it and is prepaired to use violence. These forces were present in Afghanistan and they were even seen to be a threat to the Soviet backed governments and to some republics of the Soviet Union.
 
  • #63
Count Iblis said:
It is not false at all, but to see that you may have to ditch some biased US sources. The Soviet invasion did end up doing a lot of damage, but the reason for that had a lot to do with the Western support for Islamic extremists in that country (the so-called "freedom fighters").

You quoted some examples of positive developments in Afghanistan, but you left out some crucial facts about Ismalic extremists gaining power. You cannot have a modern democratic society, if some (small) fraction of the population does not want it and is prepaired to use violence. These forces were present in Afghanistan and they were even seen to be a threat to the Soviet backed governments and to some republics of the Soviet Union.
Enough.
 
  • #64
Locked.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
15K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K