Work Definition: Force x Distance vs. Force x Displacement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizziks_Fan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definition of work in physics, emphasizing that work is calculated as the dot product of force and displacement vectors, represented by the equation W = F · D. It highlights that lifting a weight and bringing it back down results in zero net work due to zero displacement, despite the effort exerted. The conversation also distinguishes between the work done against gravity and the physiological effort experienced by the individual, noting that while the net work is zero, muscle exertion occurs during the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics, specifically dot products
  • Familiarity with the concepts of force and displacement in physics
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its effects on work
  • Basic principles of mechanical work as defined in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of work-energy principles in physics
  • Explore the relationship between force, displacement, and work in various contexts
  • Investigate the physiological aspects of muscle work during physical activities
  • Learn about the differences between positive, negative, and zero work in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, fitness professionals, and anyone interested in the principles of work and energy in physical activities.

Fizziks_Fan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi I always thought work was defined as the dot product of the force and displacement vectors.

W = F parallel to D

However, my physics teacher told me that it's force x DISTANCE.

Does that mean that whenever someone lifts a weight and brings it back down is actually doing work? (displacement is zero...) :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've always known work as W = \vec {F} \cdot \vec {D} or W = |F||D|cos\theta theta being the angle between the force and displacement vectors.

More info on work can be found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_work
 
The person does no net work when moving the block up and then back down. As you noted, the displacement is 0. You could also argue that it takes say 100 joules of work to move it up, and -100 joules of work to bring it down. However you slice it, it all adds up to nothing.
 
Distance that you are referring to is the distance moved the DIRECTION of the force. The person did do work: against gravity. When he let's go, it is actually gravity that does work, not him.
 
QuantumCrash said:
Distance that you are referring to is the distance moved the DIRECTION of the force. The person did do work: against gravity. When he let's go, it is actually gravity that does work, not him.
]But if he doesn't let go, and slowly lowers the weight to the floor, he still does work, but the net work he does in both directions is zip.
He might be tired and claim he did a lot of work, but he really didn't do any. Depends on what you mean by "work".
 
Well, if you put it that way yes. His total work against is technically negative since the direction of movement when the net work is 0. Since while he lowers down the weight, the direction of the displacement is opposite that of the force. Hence, work done is actually negative.

Note: The man feels tired because his muscles are actually doing work by continously stretching and compressing. I won't delve further since we are already touching biology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
578
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K