World destroying solar storm/binary orbit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a fictional world where civilization and life are significantly older than in our reality, influenced by recurring natural disasters. The participant is exploring the feasibility of two scenarios: a prolonged solar storm lasting 500 years or a binary star system with a sun-like star orbiting a larger, more radiation-emitting star, affecting the planet every hundred thousand years. The impact of these scenarios on evolution and a magic system is a central theme.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes the idea of a solar storm lasting 500 years as a potential catalyst for evolution and extinction events.
  • Another participant suggests a binary star system as an alternative, where a sun-like star orbits a larger star, influencing the planet's conditions periodically.
  • A participant references Cixin Liu’s "The Three Body Problem," noting similarities in themes of complex solar systems affecting civilizations.
  • Another participant mentions Isaac Asimov's "Nightfall," indicating a connection to the idea of celestial events impacting life on a planet.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express interest in the themes presented, but there is no consensus on which scenario is more realistic or effective for the intended worldbuilding. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility of the proposed ideas.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the scientific plausibility of the scenarios presented, nor does it clarify the specific mechanisms by which radiation would influence evolution or the magic system.

AidenFlamel
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Soooo, hi PF, it's been a long time since I needed your help, but here I am again.

I've been doing some worldbulding lately and I came up with this idea of a world in which civilisation and life are much, much older than in ours. Yet it isn't as developed due to some kind of natural disaster that makes a cataclysm happen either one time trough the whole planet's history or a cycle that let's this happen a few hundred thousand years or so. The thing is, I wanted this recurring events to heavily influence the way life in the planet is and develops trough generations, so I thought that some radiation would be nice to speed up the evolution of intelligent life, with the only cost of having a massive extinction every now and then (also, cool radiation generated mutations that pass natural selection are great for the magic system).

What I want to know is which of the following is more realistic to accomplish what I expect: a Solar storm that lasts 500 years or a binary star system in which a sun like star (which our planet orbits) has an enormous orbit around a much bigger, hotter and more radiation emitting star,to which it only passes close to notice it's effects every hundred thousand years or so. I left below an image of something that kind of resembles what I mean with this second scenario.
upload_2019-2-22_21-28-34.png

The magic system is complicated, so if you care I'll tell you, but it suffices to say that in order for people to use the "magic" (which isn't magic there, duh) they'll need a little push, and this radiation thing could be the way to have that naturally develop trough genetics and stuff.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-22_21-18-40.png
    upload_2019-2-22_21-18-40.png
    38.7 KB · Views: 436
  • upload_2019-2-22_21-28-34.png
    upload_2019-2-22_21-28-34.png
    64.4 KB · Views: 601
Physics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
Your theme sounds similar to Cixin Liu’s book The Three Body Problem
Thanks a lot! It seems like a really amazing story. I now want to read the whole thing, so thanks again for introducing such an idea to me!
 
It also sounds like Isaac Asimov's Nightfall.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K