Would the opposite of a perfect power be called a "root"?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ventrella
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer Power Root
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of integers that are not perfect powers, defined as integers that cannot be expressed in the form xn where both x and n are integers greater than 1. The term "roots" has been suggested, but participants agree that a more precise term is needed. The conversation also touches on the relationship between this classification and Gaussian integers, with references to the OEIS sequence A001597, which identifies non-perfect powers. Ultimately, no official name for this class of integers has been established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perfect powers and their mathematical definition.
  • Familiarity with Gaussian integers and their properties.
  • Knowledge of prime factorization and GCD (greatest common divisor) concepts.
  • Basic grasp of integer exponentiation and roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Gaussian integers and their relation to perfect powers.
  • Explore the OEIS sequence A001597 for insights on non-perfect powers.
  • Study the concept of GCD in the context of prime factorization and its implications for integer classification.
  • Investigate existing mathematical literature for any formal terminology regarding integers that are not perfect powers.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and educators interested in integer classification, perfect powers, and the properties of Gaussian integers will benefit from this discussion.

Ventrella
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
I would like to know if there is an official name for the class of integers that are (not) perfect powers. A perfect power is a number that can be expressed as xn, where x and n are both integers > 1. I have been calling these integers "roots" - since they do not have any integer roots of their own, and they are the roots of their own integer powers.

I am actually exploring the Gaussian integers, and I assume these concepts apply equally to the Gaussian integers as they do to the rational integers.

Thanks!
-Jeffrey
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The solution to f(x)=0 is called a "root" of the equation, whether f(x) is a power or anything. It can also be called a "zero" of the equation.
If y = x^n, then we say that "x is the nth root of y" even if x is not an integer.

If x is an integer, then x is called a perfect nth root.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janosh89
Thanks for the suggestion, Simon!

"Perfect nth root" makes sense. It's better than "root".

I would still like to find a way to express this class of numbers without having to reference an integer (i.e., "nth") of which it is a perfect root - since there are infinitely many n's. I think of these integers as analogous to the primes, except they are primitives of integer exponentiation instead of primitives of integer multiplication. Each of these integers is the first (x1) in an infinite series of perfect powers...and they are not members of any other set. If I'm not mistaken, the union of these sets is the set of all integers.
 
There is a single-word name for a general perfect root ... it is called "integer".
 
Maybe I didn't explain myself. I'm talking about integers that do not have perfect roots.
 
Ventrella said:
Maybe I didn't explain myself. I'm talking about integers that do not have perfect roots.
Every integer x has a perfect root ##\sqrt{x}##, for example.
 
Hello mfb,

I believe you are incorrect.

You say that every integer has a perfect root. When you say "perfect" I assume that means integer. Of course every integer has roots, but not all of them are perfect (integers). The roots of integers are either integers or real (in fact, if they are not integers, they are actually irrational: https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Nth_Root_of_Integer_is_Integer_or_Irrational ).

If my question has no answer, then that's fine, but please read my question:
"Is there a name for the class of integers that are not perfect powers?"

For instance:
x = 125 is a perfect power (it can be expressed as rn, where r = 5 and n = 3 (both integers > 1))
x = 25 is a perfect power (it can be expressed as rn, where r = 5 and n = 2 (both integers > 1))
But x = 5 is not a perfect power (it cannot be expressed as rn, where r and p are integers > 1.

The first entries of this unnamed set would be:
0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28

The missing integers from this set are:
4, 8, 9, 16, 25, 27... (the perfect powers).

I am concluding that there is no official or agreed-upon name for this class of integers. Also, I cannot find that sequence in http://oeis.org. Maybe I'll add it.

Thanks,
-j
 
Ventrella said:
I would like to know if there is an official name for the class of integers that are (not) perfect powers. A perfect power is a number that can be expressed as xn, where x and n are both integers > 1. I have been calling these integers "roots" - since they do not have any integer roots of their own, and they are the roots of their own integer powers.
"Perfect powers" I've heard of, as 4 and 9 are perfect squares (of 2 and 3), and 64 and 125 are perfect cubes (of 4 and 5). I've not heard of the term "perfect root," or a distinction between a root of, say ##x^2 = 16## or ##x^2 = 17##.
Ventrella said:
I am actually exploring the Gaussian integers, and I assume these concepts apply equally to the Gaussian integers as they do to the rational integers.
I suppose. For example, in the Gaussian integers, -1 = -1 + 0i is the square of 0 + i, and 1 = 1 + 0i is the fourth power or 0 + i. All of these are Gaussian integers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janosh89 and Ventrella
Ah, you require the root to be an integer.

So you are looking for the complement of oeis:A001597. "Not a perfect power" should do the job.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janosh89 and Simon Bridge
  • #10
Ventrella said:
I would like to know if there is an official name for the class of integers that are (not) perfect powers. A perfect power is a number that can be expressed as xn, where x and n are both integers > 1. I have been calling these integers "roots" - since they do not have any integer roots of their own, and they are the roots of their own integer powers.
What you are looking for is: all the numbers for which the GCD (greater common divisor) of the exponents of all the powers of the primes in their prime decomposition is greater than 1. By definition the prime numbers (do not) belong in this list.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
dagmar said:
What you are looking for is: all the numbers for which the GCD (greater common divisor) of the exponents of all the powers of the primes in their prime decomposition is greater than 1. By definition the prime numbers (do not) belong in this list.

Hi dagmar,

Could you elaborate? Perhaps you could decompose your definition so I can understand the component parts. Specifically, I don't understand: "...the exponents of all the powers of the primes in their prime decomposition..."

I don't see how prime numbers are involved here. But if you are correct that prime numbers are involved non-trivially, that would be interesting.

Thanks!
-j
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dagmar
  • #12
Ventrella said:
Could you elaborate? Perhaps you could decompose your definition so I can understand the component parts. Specifically, I don't understand: "...the exponents of all the powers of the primes in their prime decomposition..."
Yup, I know my English is terrible, :cry:
$$ n=p_1^{r_1} p_2^{r_2}...p_n^{r_n} $$ is prime decomposition of n. $$GCD(r_1,r_2,...,r_n)>1$$
GCD=2 => Number Perfect Square, GCD=3 => Perfect Cube, etc.

Sorry. Goodday.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K