Would we ever be able to fully understand the laws of the universe?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Delta2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether humanity will ever fully understand the laws of the universe and if it would be possible to modify those laws. Participants explore the implications of scientific laws, the limitations of human understanding, and the nature of scientific models in relation to the universe's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that human intelligence may be inherently limited, suggesting that our understanding of the universe may only ever be an approximation of its true laws.
  • Others argue that the term "law" in science is problematic, as it implies a deterministic framework that may not align with the nature of reality, particularly in light of quantum theory.
  • One participant likens the quest for complete understanding to creating an infinite recursive map, indicating that full comprehension may be unattainable.
  • There is a question raised about the possibility of modifying the laws of the universe, comparing it to a programmer's ability to set rules within a simulation.
  • Another viewpoint asserts that laws are immutable and that humanity is too insignificant to change them, emphasizing the consistency of these laws across time and space.
  • Some participants acknowledge that while interpretations of laws may change, the fundamental laws themselves are unlikely to be altered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on whether full understanding of the universe's laws is possible or if those laws can be modified. The discussion remains unresolved, highlighting differing perspectives on the nature of scientific laws and human comprehension.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in understanding are noted, particularly regarding the implications of quantum theory and the philosophical challenges of defining and modifying laws. The discussion reflects ongoing debates in the philosophy of science and the nature of scientific inquiry.

Delta2
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
6,002
Reaction score
2,628
TL;DR
would we ever be able to fully understand the laws of the universe.
And if so would we ever be able to modify them?
So first of all ,we all agree that Universe exists and it is not totally chaotic , it seems to have some laws that govern its behavior.
Would we ever be able to fully discover and understand the true laws of the universe. Or human intelligence is limited (the way the human brain is constructed and operating just has some limitations, we all understand that) and we can only understand universe up to a (say) first order approximation? That all the laws we have discover and study up to this modern era are just an approximation of the true laws, which we will never be able to discover and understand?

And suppose the answer is yes that one day we will be able to fully understand the laws of the universe. Will we ever be able to modify the laws of the universe? Or the answer is definitely negative on this as at first glance, someone will have to have magical or divine powers to modify the laws of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Delta2 said:
Summary: would we ever be able to fully understand the laws of the universe.
And if so would we ever be able to modify them?

, it seems to have some laws that govern its behavior.
As far as I can see or have read, Science doesn't really work like that. The word "law" is the problem and it's used as a result of the original belief that a god fashioned the Universe according to some design algorithms.
In reality, what we can do is to produce equations and models that describe, to some limited degree, what is observed and these equations are accepted as good enough if they can be used to predict, successfully, the results of experiments and observations.
To" fullly understand" the laws would mean that, not only would we be able to say what will happen next under any circumstances (and Quantum Theory makes that a non starter) but it would also mean that we would be able to understand and predict everything about ourselves. It's like drawing the ultimate Map of Everything which would need to include a map of The Map itself, which would include a map of that map and so on. (Turtles all the way, in fact).

All we can hope for is to keep going in the process of incremental improvement on the models we use. That's quite hard enough!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
sophiecentaur said:
As far as I can see or have read, Science doesn't really work like that. The word "law" is the problem and it's used as a result of the original belief that a god fashioned the Universe according to some design algorithms.
In reality, what we can do is to produce equations and models that describe, to some limited degree, what is observed and these equations are accepted as good enough if they can be used to predict, successfully, the results of experiments and observations.
To" fullly understand" the laws would mean that, not only would we be able to say what will happen next under any circumstances (and Quantum Theory makes that a non starter) but it would also mean that we would be able to understand and predict everything about ourselves. It's like drawing the ultimate Map of Everything which would need to include a map of The Map itself, which would include a map of that map and so on. (Turtles all the way, in fact).

All we can hope for is to keep going in the process of incremental improvement on the models we use. That's quite hard enough!
Trying to understand some parts of your answer...Thinking...Till I come up with an understanding or some good questions, what do you think about my second question, if we would be able to modify the laws of the universe? Pretty much like a programmer that makes a simulation can setup whatever laws he wants within his program? Or since we can't fully understand them because of that map of the map of the map infinite recursion (if I understood that part) we can't fully modify em, but maybe partially modify them.
 
Delta2 said:
if we would be able to modify the laws of the universe?
I think that idea is meaningless. Laws (if you want to use that actual word) are immutable - except by the governing body. We are far too insignificant to aspire to setting or changing those laws. There is pretty strong evidence that all those laws apply wherever we look - far away or far back in time so how could they be 'changed'? We would be receiving images from billions of years ago with evidence of the'old set of laws' but, locally, our laws would be different? How does that make any sense at all.
That doesn't mean we could never find, somewhere, a subset of a huge superset of those laws which would indicate that some parts of the Universe may do things diffeerrently. Evidence indicates that is unlikely so, meanwhile, we will carry on with our existing knowledge.
Edit: We are constantly changing our interpretation of things - if that's what you are after.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K