Would you recommend I go to graduate school? I'm trying to be an actuary.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to pursue graduate school for a career as an actuary, particularly in light of current job market conditions and the value of practical experience versus advanced education. Participants explore various educational paths, the importance of actuarial exams, and the relevance of internships in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that passing actuarial exams could strengthen graduate school applications and recommends considering a Master's in Statistics over specialized degrees like Risk Management.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of gaining real work experience in an insurance company rather than pursuing graduate school, arguing that practical experience is more valuable.
  • Some participants note that while the market for actuaries is good, the market for actuarial analysts may not be as favorable, which could affect job prospects.
  • There is a suggestion to build professional relationships early, including reaching out to actuarial departments and leveraging any connections from undergraduate studies.
  • One participant shares their experience of a prolonged hiring process for credentialed actuaries, indicating a competitive job market.
  • Another participant mentions that graduates typically benefit from working at major insurance companies where they receive training for actuarial exams rather than pursuing graduate degrees.
  • Concerns are raised about the relevance of an internship in operations to actuarial roles, with some suggesting it may not significantly impact job prospects.
  • A later reply asserts that graduate school may not provide any additional knowledge beneficial for actuarial jobs that wouldn't be learned through exams or practical work experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the necessity and value of graduate school for aspiring actuaries, with some advocating for immediate exam preparation and work experience, while others see potential benefits in further education. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the uncertainty surrounding job market conditions and the varying definitions of relevant qualifications, which may depend on specific job roles and employer expectations.

Hodgey8806
Messages
140
Reaction score
3
I am currently graduating from the University of Texas at Arlington with a 4.0, and I have my BofSci degree in math with an emphasis in ops research. I'm preparing for my actuarial tests, and I'm not worried about passing them. However, I know it's a bit of a tight market. I was considering studying finance to make myself more marketable, but I know my end game is being an actuary. So, should I spend my time without working as an actuary to study and improve my skills, or should I go to graduate school.

Btw, I am trying to get into either UT Austin or UT Dallas (to stay close to businesses) as my main schools studying either business analytics or financial risk management.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Hodgey8806.

I don't know what your Plan B is specifically, but if you think you can take a few exams then you should take them immediately and show in your applications your able to pass the exams (which is what they care about).

I would go and recommend say a Masters of Statistics because of the hyper-specialization of a Risk Management degree or a "Business Analytics" which is just a nice corporate word for data mining, pattern recognition and other similar things.

Its just my opinion of course, but the thing I worry about is that you will get specialized that would bar you from other jobs that are similar but don't understand the nature of your qualification.

If you can sell your qualification of choice then that's great, but nowadays its getting harder with hiring companies not really understanding what the buzz words mean amongst other things.
 
I think you should attempt to pass some of the exams and see how the market works out for you. If you find it extremely hard to get a job, then it wouldn't hurt to beef up your application, but from my understanding, the market for an actuary is rather good, and it shouldn't be too hard for you to get a job.*

*Of course, if you limit your choices to one city, you might be making it harder.
 
Largely agree with the other posters, with one clarification – MarneMath says the market for actuaries is good, and they are correct. However, the market for actuarial analysts is not, and it will be 2 – 4 years before the OP becomes an actuary.

OP, if your goal is to become an actuary I wouldn’t suggest grad school at all. More school isn’t as impressive as some real work at an insurance company. The underwriting department is a great place to start, if you can get a job there.

Only a few actuarial departments are going to care about business analytics or financial risk management much. A statistics masters is probably your best bet, but spending more years in schools seems like a real waste.

The SOA is offering P/1 in March, are you registered?

Did you get your VEE’s taken care of while you were in school?
 
As a side note, you should consider starting to build relationships soon, even if “building relationships” ends up meaning “get your name in their head”. At the latest, once you get a preliminary pass from exam P/1, send a few (hundred?) targeted emails to actuarial departments you might want to work at. Mention that you’re looking or will be looking for an actuarial job and include your resume.

If anyone you know or that went to your undergrad university works in an actuarial department, make contact with them. Let them know you’re looking for work and see if they don’t mind your asking a few questions about what they do and what work in their department is like.

You likely won’t get a bite before you get at least two official passes, but you never know. Part of the trick is that few actuarial departments are not in a constant state of hiring at the entry level. When they do decide to hire, having your resume on hand may be beneficial to you both.
 
MarneMath said:
the market for an actuary is rather good

To expand on previous comments,

Our department has been looking to hire a credentialed actuary for two years now. We’ve made a few offers, but they’re always snatched up by someone else. I don’t think (but can’t know for certain) that the offers are low; I think there’s just nobody out there.

I have a theory consulting firms have gobbled them all up. At least, that’s the impression I get from the recruiters who have been calling me; they keep asking me if I’d be excited to move to these particular cities. Those cities usually have lots of consultants and not many/any insurance companies.
 
I'm the only person in my department actually at work today.

So, more locrian spam than usual.
 
Typically, graduates from actuarial programs go to work for a major insurance company where there are classes in the various actuarial exams, and they get raises for passing them, rather than taking a graduate degree in them.
 
Thank you for your responses. Currently, I am interning as an ops analyst at a distribution center. I don't plan to stick in operations, however.

Do you think the fact that I have a internship experience--though it's not in insurance--will work in my favor?
 
  • #10
It can. Potential employers are going to ask questions to try and figure out what you did and see how the experience reflects on you.

Actuarial employers are interested in hiring someone who has the potential to learn skills necessary to do the job, someone who can pass the actuarial exams, and someone they want to work closely with. An internship isn't going to help much with the first two, but it may help with the last one.

As a side note, there's absolutely nothing you would learn in grad school that would help you in my job that you wouldn't learn in the exams anyways. It's probably true that there is nothing you will learn in grad school that would benefit you in my job that you wouldn't learn in any office job with some responsibility. It might even be true, depending on what you go to grad school in, that there's nothing you would learn in grad school that would help you in my job, period.
 
  • #11
Thanks again for your reply.

I will be registering for my first exam hopefully by March!

Have a great 2013!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
26K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K