Writing y′′+P(x)y′+Q(x)y=g(x) as a Fredholm Integral Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting the second-order boundary value ordinary differential equation (ODE) of the form y'' + P(x)y' + Q(x)y = g(x) into a Fredholm integral equation while retaining the y' term. The provided solution explicitly defines the kernel and demonstrates the process of integrating the ODE to derive y(x) in terms of integrals involving p(t), q(t), and g(t). The final expression for y(x) incorporates boundary conditions and integral terms, showcasing the relationship between the ODE and integral equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with Fredholm integral equations
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems and boundary conditions
  • Proficiency in integration techniques and integral transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fredholm integral equations from linear ODEs
  • Learn about Green's functions and their applications in solving ODEs
  • Explore the method of integration by parts in the context of differential equations
  • Investigate the transformation techniques for solving second-order linear ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with boundary value problems, particularly those interested in the application of integral equations to solve differential equations.

bolbteppa
Messages
300
Reaction score
41
Is it possible to convert a general linear second order boundary value ode

[tex]y'' + P(x)y' + Q(x)y = g(x), y(a) = y_a, y(b) = y_b[/tex]

to a Fredholm integral equation, explicitly determining the Kernel in the process, without removing the [itex]y'[/itex] term? (Here is an example of doing it without the [itex]y'[/itex] term) I seem to be getting stuck.

My answer (computed below if necessary) is

[tex]y(x) = y_a+[\frac{y_b-y_a}{b-a}+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bp(t)y(t)dt + \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^b[q(t)-p'(t)](b-t)y(t)dt - \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bg(t)(b-t)dt](x-a)-\int_a^xp(t)y(t)dt - \int_a^x[q(t)-p'(t)](x-t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)(x-t)dt[/tex]

How do we write this in terms of an integral kernel, and can we call our result a Green function?

Note: Here is an example from Arfken of how it is done for the simple case of [itex]y''+\omega^2 y = 0, y(0)=0, y(b)=0[/itex]:

oBDsG.png


- Computation:

Integrating

[tex]y'' = - P(x)y' - Q(x)y + g(x)[/tex]

gives us

[tex]y'(x) = y'_a -<br /> \int_a^xp(t)y'(t)dt-\int_a^xq(t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)dt[/tex]

which, on getting rid of the $y'$ term by I.B.P.,

[tex]y'(x) = y'_a +y_ap(a)-p(x)y(x) +<br /> \int_a^xp'(t)y(t)dt-\int_a^xq(t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)dt[/tex]

gives us

[tex]y'(x) = y'_a +y_ap(a)-p(x)y(x) -<br /> \int_a^x[q(t)-p'(t)]y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)dt[/tex]

Integrating to find $y$ gives

[tex]y(x) = y_a+[y'_a +y_ap(a)](x-a)-\int_a^xp(t)y(t)dt -<br /> \int_a^x\int_a^u[q(t)-p'(t)]y(t)dtdu+\int_a^x\int_a^ug(t)dtdu[/tex]

or


[tex]y(x) = y_a+[y'_a +y_ap(a)](x-a)-\int_a^xp(t)y(t)dt -<br /> \int_a^x[q(t)-p'(t)](x-t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)(x-t)dt[/tex]

or


[tex]y(x) = y_a+[y'_a +y_ap(a)](x-a)-\int_a^xp(t)y(t)dt -<br /> \int_a^x[q(t)-p'(t)](x-t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)(x-t)dt[/tex]

Now, to remove the undetermined constant [itex]y'_a[/itex] we can use the B.C.
[itex]y(b)=y_b[/itex] to find

[tex]y'_a = \frac{y_b-y_a}{b-a}-y_ap(a)+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bp(t)y(t)dt<br /> + \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^b[q(t)-p'(t)](b-t)y(t)dt - \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bg(t)(b-t)dt[/tex]

So that the solution is

[tex]y(x) = y_a+[\frac{y_b-y_a}{b-a}+\frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bp(t)y(t)dt +<br /> \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^b[q(t)-p'(t)](b-t)y(t)dt -<br /> \frac{1}{b-a}\int_a^bg(t)(b-t)dt](x-a)-\int_a^xp(t)y(t)dt -<br /> \int_a^x[q(t)-p'(t)](x-t)y(t)dt+\int_a^xg(t)(x-t)dt[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maybe this will help:

Any second order linear homogeneous ODE of the form az"+bz'+cz=0 can be written as y"-ry=0
using the transformation [itex]y=z \exp(-\int\frac{b}{2a}dx)[/itex] with [itex]r=\frac{b^2+2ab'-2ba'-4ac}{4a^2}[/itex]

so you transform first into something you know how to solve, then transform the answer back (in this case transforming the answer in y back to z by using the inverse transform [itex]z=y \exp(\int\frac{b}{2a}))[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K