Your most interesting fact about Pi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Pi
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
26 replies · 4K views
Messages
19,943
Reaction score
11,027
Pi day is tomorrow! 3.14!

What is your most interesting fact or insight about the number Pi?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That ##\tau (= 2\pi)## would have been a better choice :-p
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2, ohwilleke, DennisN and 1 other person
Greg Bernhardt said:
Pi day is tomorrow! 3.14!

What is your most interesting fact or insight about the number Pi?
Beside the fact that ##e^{i\pi}+1=0##, it is that it took so unbelievably long until its transcendence has been proven. I have a vague memory of the proof, and it wasn't that complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
[tex]\frac {\pi^2} 6= \sum_N \frac 1 {n^2} = \prod_P(1-\frac 1 {p^2})^{-1}[/tex]

(where P are primes and N are natural numbers)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995, dRic2, ohwilleke and 2 others
A pie pi wide is pi square round.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jehannum, cnh1995, Ibix and 3 others
I got married on Pi Day 3.141987... . :smile:
(BTW, Greg... thanks for the reminder)

Still married to the same one, two too... . :biggrin:
Pi Day 3.142018 is also the day the great physicist Stephen Hawking died, at age 76... . :frown:

.
 
Last edited:
61iR8qY7AML._SL500_.jpg


Be Rational, Get Real - NEW Funny Humor Joke POSTER
 

Attachments

  • 61iR8qY7AML._SL500_.jpg
    61iR8qY7AML._SL500_.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 680
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, BillTre, ohwilleke and 3 others
Q. What is the volume of a pizza with radius z and thickness a?

A. pizza
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, cnh1995, PeroK and 6 others
39f4bf13efa51c1eee9f5c145ba6035f.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 39f4bf13efa51c1eee9f5c145ba6035f.jpg
    39f4bf13efa51c1eee9f5c145ba6035f.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 646
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995, PeroK, Filip Larsen and 3 others
fresh_42 said:
Beside the fact that ##e^{i\pi}+1=0##, it is that it took so unbelievably long until its transcendence has been proven. I have a vague memory of the proof, and it wasn't that complicated.

At what level would one have to be for it to be 'not that complicated'? I first read about it quite young, still at school, in Eric Temple Bell's book on the great mathematicians, in the chapter on Hermite by which time, well into the 19th-century It was all getting rather intimidating and oppressive, everything above one's head. But Temple Bell (funny name) had a knack of phrases which somehow stuck in the mind. Even when they were, as in this case, not his.

Charles Hermite was first to prove the transcendence (? transcendentiality?) of a 'naturally occurring' number, i.e. one not invented for the purpose of proving transcendence, i.e. .I suppose for proving existence of such numbers. The number was ##e##. The memorable phrase I still remember without having the book by me was when he said, someone should be able to prove the trancendence of π "but believe me, dear friend, it will not fail to cost them some efforts.'

Having written that, I was curious to trace the original quotation, which today the miracle of Internet allows me to do from home, allows me to do at all.

Je ne me hasarderai point à la recherche d’une démonstration de la transcendance du nombre π. Que d’autres tentent l’entreprise. Nul ne serait plus heureux que moi de leur succès. Mais, croyez m’en, mon cher ami, il ne laissera pas que de leur en coûter quelques efforts.

(Some phrasing there sounds slightly antique to me, can someone confirm?) But if one of the most famous mathematicians of all time said that of one of most famous problems (impossibility of squaring the circle in Euclidean geometry depends on it), it's not sounding "wasn't that complicated". But maybe somebody has discovered a simpler way? Accessible to ordinary mortals? Is there a standard way of doing it?
 
Last edited:
You can remember the first 8 digits of pi by counting the letters of each word in the sentence "May I have a large container of coffee".

Albert Einstein was born on March 14 (Pi Day).

The first 6 digits of pi appear in order 6 times (I think it's 6) in the first ten million digits of pi.

I know the thread title said "your most interesting fact", but can you tell I like pi? I have memorized all of the digits of pi (right now I'm just working on getting them in order :smile: :wink:).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, DrClaude, AlexCaledin and 1 other person
Fig Neutron said:
"May I have a large container of coffee"

- this is stronger than coffee :
How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics :skullXbones:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude and Fig Neutron
You are right.It is pointless.But still quite impressive what the human mind can do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and fresh_42
Ibix said:
To better than 0.5%, a year is ##\pi\times 10^7## seconds.

Aliens!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and DennisN
fresh_42 said:
Beside the fact that ##e^{i\pi}+1=0##, it is that it took so unbelievably long until its transcendence has been proven. I have a vague memory of the proof, and it wasn't that complicated.
##\pi = - i \ \ln(-1)## or ##\pi = - 2 \ i \ \ln(i)##

There you have it. :)
 
37702f50-cb9e-0133-971f-0ec2e53676a1.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 37702f50-cb9e-0133-971f-0ec2e53676a1.jpg
    37702f50-cb9e-0133-971f-0ec2e53676a1.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 554
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and Ibix
PeroK said:
Changing to ##\tau = 2\pi## would be worthwhile just to highlight the pointlessness of that if nothing else.
On the other hand, two pies are better than one.

Is there a constant called cookie?
 
Borek said:
[tex]\frac {\pi^2} 6= \sum_N \frac 1 {n^2} = \prod_P(1-\frac 1 {p^2})^{-1}[/tex]

(where P are primes and N are natural numbers)
Just found
$$\int_0^1 \frac{\log x}{x-1} \,dx = \frac{\pi^2}{6}$$
I don't like this Pythagorean numerology in me, but I can't escape its fascination. What is it with this ##\pi^2/6\,##?
 
fresh_42 said:
Just found
$$\int_0^1 \frac{\log x}{x-1} \,dx = \frac{\pi^2}{6}$$
I don't like this Pythagorean numerology in me, but I can't escape its fascination. What is it with this ##\pi^2/6\,##?
Expand ##\log(x)## in a Taylor series and integrate to get ##\sum \frac{1}{n^2}##