- #1
- 32
- 0
Please help!
OK so when we looked at the Zeeman effect, we used the states
|n, j, l, m>
where these are the quantum numbers associated with H, J^2, L^2 and Jz respectively.
We derived the perturbation Hamiltonian as
h = (eB/2m)(Lz + 2Sz)
Then you can work out the energy shifts for, the state with n=2, j=1/2 and l=0.
BUT what confuses me is that J^2 doesn't commute with the peturbed Hamiltonian. So the eigenstates of the peturbed Hamiltonian do not have well-defined j. But as we know all the possible values of m of the peturbed states (as they are the same as the possible values of the unpeturbed states), doesn't that imply a value of j=m(max)?
I'm not putting this across well but I can't think how else to describe the difficulty I'm having.
Thanks for reading and hopefully replying!
OK so when we looked at the Zeeman effect, we used the states
|n, j, l, m>
where these are the quantum numbers associated with H, J^2, L^2 and Jz respectively.
We derived the perturbation Hamiltonian as
h = (eB/2m)(Lz + 2Sz)
Then you can work out the energy shifts for, the state with n=2, j=1/2 and l=0.
BUT what confuses me is that J^2 doesn't commute with the peturbed Hamiltonian. So the eigenstates of the peturbed Hamiltonian do not have well-defined j. But as we know all the possible values of m of the peturbed states (as they are the same as the possible values of the unpeturbed states), doesn't that imply a value of j=m(max)?
I'm not putting this across well but I can't think how else to describe the difficulty I'm having.
Thanks for reading and hopefully replying!