View Full Version : [SOLVED] How Do We Know The Age Of The Universe For Sure?
Silverbackman
Dec16-05, 04:47 AM
Cosomologists estimate the universe 10-15 billion years but this is only by dating where the farthest reaches off light go. We only know 10% of our universe, the other 90% is dark matter. So how do we know that out univere isn't much older??
Chronos
Dec17-05, 03:07 AM
We don't. But, the best evidence available suggests the observable universe is about 14 billion years old. This estimate was derived by reverse engineering observational evidence and applying our knowledge of physical processes.
I read in the paper that there was a probe sent into space measuring microwave radiation and it dated the universe rather accurately and then bumped into some odd results about 2 years ago that have never been released. There were patterns in the radiation or something. Does anyone have a link on this story?
I have forgotten the details, but some of you must know about it if the story is true.
I read in the paper that there was a probe sent into space measuring microwave radiation and it dated the universe rather accurately and then bumped into some odd results about 2 years ago that have never been released. There were patterns in the radiation or something. Does anyone have a link on this story?
I have forgotten the details, but some of you must know about it if the story is true.This is the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/).
Together with observations of distant Type Ia supernovae WMAP measured the age of the universe to be 13.7±0.2 Gyr.
The first years results were published on time but the next year's results have been delayed over two years and that has led to much speculation. Watch this space!
Garth
Chronos
Dec18-05, 03:17 AM
My understanding is the main reason for the the delay in WMAP year 2 is in trying to sort out the polarization data. Rumor has it, it should hit the street almost any day now. Should be pretty exciting.
My understanding is the main reason for the the delay in WMAP year 2 is in trying to sort out the polarization data. Rumor has it, it should hit the street almost any day now. Should be pretty exciting.
"Rumour" has it that it could be any of the following:
Systematics in polarization maps
Axis of evil detected at 12 sigmas
Wiggles in the TT spectrum
Non Gaussianities
Message from the Creator found (see http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510102 !)
The doppler peaks are not there anymore, what we do now ?
or anything else!
Taken from CosmoCoffee (http://cosmocoffee.info/viewtopic.php?t=387) poll.
Garth
Chronos
Dec19-05, 01:26 AM
Indeed, these are exciting times. Apparently I'm mongering from some of the same rumor mills as the folks at CC. I have a hunch that WMAP 2 will be 90-95% consistent with the concordance model. And the other 5-10% will further confuse the swirl of controversy that fell out of the non-concordant stuff from WMAP 1. Science is great fun.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.