PDA

View Full Version : Anyone familiar with Peano' (or Grassman) algebra?


enigma
Mar7-04, 05:21 PM
I'm an engineer, not a mathematician...

the professor has assigned several proof questions, and I'm having difficulty answering them...

(This may need to be moved to homework help, but the topic is unusual, so I thought I'd get better response here)

Terminology: v is a join operation, ^ is a meet operation D[] is a bracket operation

Example:

Show that when:

A = a_1 \vee a_2, B = b_1 \vee b_2, \ and\ n = 2

then

A \wedge B = -D[a_2 , b_1 , b_2] a_1 + D[a_1 , b_1 , b_2] a_2
= D[a_1 , a_2 , b_2] b_1 - D[a_1 , a_2 , b_1] b_2

If the meet is zero, then assuming that the sets (a_1, a_2) and (b_1, b_2) are both independent, the four brackets must be zero. Show that, in this case, the two subspaces A_s and B_s are the same.

Now, proving the first part is fairly simple: just run though the definition of the meet.

I'm having difficulty with the second part. I thought that the definition of the meet is the intersection of the two subspaces. If the subspaces are the equal, then wouldn't the meet be either As or Bs?

enigma
Mar7-04, 05:55 PM
Answering my own question somewhat:

OK. If the sets are independant, and \alpha a_1 + \beta a_2 = 0 , then \alpha \ and \ \beta need to be zero because independancy implies a_1 \ and \ a_2 are not equal.

If D[a_i, b_i, b_j] \ and \ D[a_i, a_j, b_i] are zero for any combination of i and j, that means that the two subspaces A and B are linearly dependant for any combination of bases. This must mean that they are the same subspace.

Is that correct?

Janitor
Mar7-04, 06:00 PM
Pardon my ignorance; I have barely ever done any reading on Grassman algebra. I probably won't be able to help you. But what is the definition of n?

enigma
Mar7-04, 06:06 PM
n is the number of dimensions in addition to the projective plane: PA[Rn+1], where PA represents peano algebra.

so, the dimensions of a two dimensional projective space is PA[R2+1] corresponding to e0 e1 and e2 as the three coordinates, with e1 being the x direction, e2 being the y direction and e0 being the perspective direction.

*I hope I'm not botching up my terminology here...*

Janitor
Mar7-04, 06:10 PM
I'll get back to you in a few weeks on this.


[:D]

Janitor
Mar29-04, 12:56 AM
You must know the answer by now! If you have time, could you sketch it out for us? If you're too busy, that's understandable.