PDA

View Full Version : [SOLVED] Distance between two charges where field strength = 0


TFM
Apr28-08, 12:51 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Two particles having charges q1 = 0.500 nC and q2 = 9.00 nC are separated by a distance of 2.00 m.

At what point along the line connecting the two charges is the total electric field due to the two charges equal to zero?

2. Relevant equations

E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0}\frac{q}{r^2}

I have reduced this two:

\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}

3. The attempt at a solution

putting in the variables:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{r_1^2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{r_2^2}

I can rearrang to get:

\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{0.5*10^{-9}},

and:

\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = 18

But I am not sure how to get the right distance to the actual point?

TFM

Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 01:11 PM
From this point,

\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}

let x be the distance from the first charge to the point where E=0 such that,

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{(2-x)^2}

Do you follow?

TFM
Apr28-08, 01:37 PM
That makes sense, so now:

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}

Rearranging:

\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

And, inserting q1 and q2:

0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

How does this look?

TFM

Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 01:50 PM
That makes sense, so now:

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}

Rearranging:

\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

And, inserting q1 and q2:

0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

How does this look?

TFM
Looks good to me, although I would be tempted to leave the ratio of the charges as a fraction.

TFM
Apr28-08, 02:00 PM
So:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}

Okay, so where should I go from here?

TFM

Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 02:06 PM
So:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}

Okay, so where should I go from here?

TFM
How about multiplying through by the denominator of the RHS, then solving for x?

TFM
Apr28-08, 02:31 PM
So:

(0.5*10^{-9})(4 - 4x + x^2) = 9 x 10^{-9}x^2

(2*10^{-9} - (2*10^{-9})x + (0.5*10^{-9})x^2 = 9*10^{-9}x^2

Doubling everything:

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2

Taking everything over to the LHS:

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + ((1-18)*10^{-9})x^2 = 0

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (-17*10^{-9})x^2 = 0

Then using the formula:

x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}

where:

a = 4*10^{-9} , b = -4*10^{-9} , c = -17*10^{-9}

Giving:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}

Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?

TFM

Nick89
Apr28-08, 02:39 PM
You're correct except for the bit where you start using the quadratic formula.

The quadratic formula as you have written it corresponds to:
ax^2 + bx + c = 0

However, you're equation is in the form:
c + bx + ax^2 = 0

(Which is obviously the same, but you are switching a and c!)

TFM
Apr28-08, 02:45 PM
Giving:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}

Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?

TFM

Thanks, Nick89, This should be:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{2*-17*10^{-8}}

This gives -0.61 and 0.38, which look better

TFM

TFM
Apr28-08, 02:47 PM
I just tried putting in 0.38, an it is the correct answer :smile:

Thanks everybody,

TFM