View Full Version : [SOLVED] Distance between two charges where field strength = 0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Two particles having charges q1 = 0.500 nC and q2 = 9.00 nC are separated by a distance of 2.00 m.
At what point along the line connecting the two charges is the total electric field due to the two charges equal to zero?
2. Relevant equations
E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0}\frac{q}{r^2}
I have reduced this two:
\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}
3. The attempt at a solution
putting in the variables:
\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{r_1^2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{r_2^2}
I can rearrang to get:
\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{0.5*10^{-9}},
and:
\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = 18
But I am not sure how to get the right distance to the actual point?
TFM
Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 01:11 PM
From this point,
\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}
let x be the distance from the first charge to the point where E=0 such that,
\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{(2-x)^2}
Do you follow?
That makes sense, so now:
\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}
Rearranging:
\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}
And, inserting q1 and q2:
0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}
How does this look?
TFM
Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 01:50 PM
That makes sense, so now:
\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}
Rearranging:
\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}
And, inserting q1 and q2:
0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}
How does this look?
TFM
Looks good to me, although I would be tempted to leave the ratio of the charges as a fraction.
So:
\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}
Okay, so where should I go from here?
TFM
Hootenanny
Apr28-08, 02:06 PM
So:
\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}
Okay, so where should I go from here?
TFM
How about multiplying through by the denominator of the RHS, then solving for x?
So:
(0.5*10^{-9})(4 - 4x + x^2) = 9 x 10^{-9}x^2
(2*10^{-9} - (2*10^{-9})x + (0.5*10^{-9})x^2 = 9*10^{-9}x^2
Doubling everything:
(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2
(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2
Taking everything over to the LHS:
(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + ((1-18)*10^{-9})x^2 = 0
(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (-17*10^{-9})x^2 = 0
Then using the formula:
x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}
where:
a = 4*10^{-9} , b = -4*10^{-9} , c = -17*10^{-9}
Giving:
x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}
Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?
TFM
You're correct except for the bit where you start using the quadratic formula.
The quadratic formula as you have written it corresponds to:
ax^2 + bx + c = 0
However, you're equation is in the form:
c + bx + ax^2 = 0
(Which is obviously the same, but you are switching a and c!)
Giving:
x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}
Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?
TFM
Thanks, Nick89, This should be:
x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{2*-17*10^{-8}}
This gives -0.61 and 0.38, which look better
TFM
I just tried putting in 0.38, an it is the correct answer :smile:
Thanks everybody,
TFM
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.