What are the flaws in Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion identifies significant flaws in Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory (NGFT), particularly its reliance on the unstable concept of "element 115" as proposed by Bob Lazar. A critical challenge is the inability to reconcile the Strong Nuclear Force with Gravity due to the Electrostatic Repulsion of protons within the nucleus. The conversation also raises questions about the existence of an "island of stability" for heavy elements beyond element 115, suggesting a need for further investigation into the properties of these elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nuclear Physics concepts, particularly the Strong Nuclear Force
  • Familiarity with Electrostatic Repulsion in atomic structures
  • Knowledge of the stability of heavy elements and the concept of the "island of stability"
  • Awareness of Bob Lazar's theories and their scientific reception
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and stability of heavy elements beyond element 115
  • Explore the relationship between the Strong Nuclear Force and Gravity in modern physics
  • Investigate the scientific validity of Bob Lazar's claims regarding element 115
  • Learn about current theories and experiments related to the unification of fundamental forces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in nuclear science, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of gravitation and nuclear forces.

PFanalog57
Messages
384
Reaction score
0
What are the flaws with this theory?

http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/NGFT_Chapter_8.htm


The largest stumbling block to proving that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are one and the same force is overcoming the Electrostatic Repulsion of the protons in the nucleus...

:eek: :eek: :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One major flaw with it, is that it relies on the "element 115" concept of Bob Lazar. But element 115 was discovered to be unstable, according to many sources on the internet.

So the question becomes "Does there exist the island of stability for certain heavy elements in the 115 -->upwards range, that have interesting & exotic properties?"
 
I don't know if Lazar was pulling from real science or just more of his made up physics. At times he does a pretty good job of mixing the two. You might ask the question directly - without Lazar in play.

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65
 

Similar threads

Graduate How does the strong force loses its strength with distance?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Is my understanding of nuclear fusion and binding energy correct?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Graduate MOND from SU(2) gravitational dipoles
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Basic definition: Nuclear Fusion & Fission
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
High School Are real theories undiscoverable from effective field theories?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Graduate Is Fatio–Le Sage's theory of gravitation an entropic gravity?
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Graduate Could a Theory of Everything Unlock New Technological Marvels?
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
High School Linking Quantum Physics and Relativity: Theory of Everything?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
High School Gravitational fields affecting each other?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Undergrad Potential energy and the gravitational field of a collapsing cloud of gas
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K