Calculating Error in Energy Measurement with Scintillation Counter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty in energy measurements derived from a scintillation counter using the linear equation energy = mx + c, where m is the gradient and c is the intercept. The user has a gradient of 0.0037 with an error of 0.0002, and an intercept of -0.0187 with an error of 0.005. The uncertainty in the x values (channel number) is consistently ±2. The discussion highlights the application of the error propagation formula, specifically the equation σ_f² = (∂f/∂a)²σ_a² + (∂f/∂b)²σ_b² + (∂f/∂c)²σ_c², to derive the uncertainty in energy measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear regression analysis using Excel, specifically the polyfit function.
  • Familiarity with error propagation techniques in physics.
  • Knowledge of scintillation counters and their operational principles.
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of error propagation in experimental physics.
  • Learn how to implement the polyfit function in Excel for linear regression analysis.
  • Research the principles of scintillation counting and its applications in energy measurement.
  • Explore advanced error analysis techniques, including Monte Carlo simulations for uncertainty estimation.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those involved in experimental research and data analysis, as well as professionals working with scintillation counters and energy measurement techniques.

retupmoc
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi I am currently trying to write up a lab report for my 3rd year lab on the scintillation counter and I am struggling to convert the error i have for the gradient and intercept (using polyfit on excel) and the uncertainty i have in my x values, to the uncertainty in my energy measurements where energy=mx+c. c is the y intercept and m the gradient. The x value here is the channel number for the photo peak with an error of plus or minus 2, My gradient is 0.0037 with error 0.0002 and intercept -0.0187 with error 0.005. How do i get the error in energy from this, note the uncertainty in channel number was always 2 despite it ranging from 40 to 400. any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any hints?
 
Uncertainty for a general function f(a,b,c) can be calculated from

[tex]\sigma_f^2 = \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial a}\right)^2{\sigma_a}^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial b}\right)^2{\sigma_b}^2 + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial c} \right)^2{\sigma_c}^2[/tex]

It's easy to see how this equation would extend to a function of more variables.

--J
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K