Solving Potential Divider Questions: Output Voltage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the output voltage in a potential divider circuit with a 6V battery and four resistors: two in parallel (800Ω and 400Ω) and two in series. The correct output voltage across terminals P and Q is confirmed to be 4V, derived from the equivalent resistances of the resistor pairs. The top resistors yield an equivalent resistance of 400/3Ω, while the bottom pair results in 800/3Ω, leading to a voltage divider ratio of 2/3. The confusion regarding current flow through the wire CD is clarified by recognizing the parallel configuration of the resistors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential divider circuits
  • Knowledge of series and parallel resistor combinations
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law (V=IR)
  • Basic circuit analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of voltage dividers in more complex circuits
  • Learn how to calculate equivalent resistances in parallel and series configurations
  • Explore the concept of current direction in circuits with multiple paths
  • Investigate practical applications of potential dividers in electronic devices
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of potential divider circuits and resistor configurations.

jamie_o
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having a bit of trouble with a potential divider question. I have an answer but I'm not sure if its right and if not, why its not right. I've attached a crude drawing of my problem below, I have a question asking what the output voltage is (between P and Q terminals) with the given resistances in ohms and battery of p.d. 6V. I think what is confusing me is the line drawn between C and D. Anyway, I know that the output voltage is the resistance across where the circuit is divided x current in circuit. The problem I had was whether to work out the effective resistance of the 2 resistors in parallel (the 800 and 400). I worked out total resistance in the whole circuit to be 400ohms (1/600 + 1/1200=1/Rtot). The current turned out (V=IRtot) as 0.015A. So working out output voltage I got 0.015 x Reff (1/400 + 1/800= 1/Reff) which gave an output of 4V which seemed like a reasonable answer. This was by simplifying the 4 resistors into 2 resistors in series. The problem with this is that the next question asks if there is a current flowing in this wire (CD) and if so what direction (as conventional current). Given how I have simplified the 4 resistors, and that the P output terminal will be +ve I would say that conventional current will be flowing from C to D? But I am confused because there are actually 4 resistors which is the problem.

Sorry I've made such an essay out of it, but I'm very confused, I've had no trouble with the more simple potential divider questions but this 1 was totally different. I'm not entirely convinced of my answer to the output voltage. I would appreciate if someone did a quick check on my work and maybe explain this circuit to me and anything I've got wrong. Thanks very much, Jamie
 

Attachments

  • divider.JPG
    divider.JPG
    5.9 KB · Views: 503
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks to the connection between C and D both the top two resistors and the bottom two resistors form parallel pairs.

upload_2016-2-7_18-5-54.png


Find the two equivalent resistances and the circuit is reduced to the classic voltage divider scenario.

The top resistors reduce to an equivalent of 400/3 Ω. The bottom pair reduce to 800/3 Ω. So they are in a 1 to 2 ratio. That makes the output of the divider 2/3 of the input (that is, 2/(2 + 1) = 2/3).

So the output across terminal PQ will be 4 V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K