Calculating Rotational Motion: Proving Velocity is Perpendicular to Radius

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of rotational motion, specifically focusing on proving that velocity is perpendicular to the radius in circular motion. The original poster attempts to derive the relationship using cylindrical coordinates and expresses confusion regarding the conditions necessary for circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of cylindrical coordinates and the implications of setting certain derivatives to zero for circular motion. Questions arise about the necessity of specific conditions and the relevance of the coordinate system used.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions for circular motion, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach or the implications of the coordinate system choice.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's confusion regarding the relationship between the radius and velocity, as well as the potential complications introduced by the orientation of the circular motion in relation to the coordinate system. Participants are questioning the assumptions made about the motion and the coordinate system's suitability.

Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
I calculated the equations for circlular motion as fallows...

[tex] \vec{r}= p \hat{e_p} + z \hat{e_z}[/tex] where e_p = unit vector in the radial direction, and so on

[tex] \frac{\partial{\vec{r}}}{\partial{t}} = \dot{p}\hat{e_p} + p\dot{\theta}\hat{e_{\theta}} + \dot{z}\hat{e_z}[/tex]

how do i show that the velocity is perpendicular to the radius, show me my mistake, but...
[tex]\vec{r} \bullet \vec{\dot{r}} = p \dot{p} + z \dot{z}[/tex] which isn't obvious to me that that is 0 so what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm missing the point of what you are doing, but if you want to deduce something about circular motion, you must impose some conditions. What you've described so far is just the use of cylindrical coordinates to describe any motion. For circular motion, set [itex]\dot{p} = \dot{z} = 0[/itex]; then all terms in the velocity drop out except [itex]p\dot{\theta}\hat{e_{\theta}}[/itex].
 
i agree the dp/dt would be zero, however if circle is oriented at some angle to a xyz coord system, then wouldn't dz/dt be non-zero

bare with the picture the blue lines are there to help u reference where in the plane the point is
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    9.1 KB · Views: 451
Phymath said:
i agree the dp/dt would be zero, however if circle is oriented at some angle to a xyz coord system, then wouldn't dz/dt be non-zero
Sure. But if your circle is oriented at an angle to your z-axis, you've chosen an inconvenient coordinate system to describe the circular motion. The advantage of cylindrical coordinates is only apparent if the circular motion is centered around the z-axis.
 
i agree it is inconvenient however should it not be able to be calculated, not sure what u mean bye the "advantage of cylindrical coordinates is only apparent if the circluar motion is centered around the z-axis"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K