How Do You Solve the Logistic Equation Explicitly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richter915
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the logistic equation explicitly, specifically the differential equation involving population dynamics represented by the equation dP/dT = kP(1-P/K)(1-m/P). Participants are exploring how to differentiate and integrate this equation to find P(t).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation of the equation and the need to find the function P(t) that satisfies the given differential equation. There are attempts to clarify the meaning of "explicitly" in this context, with some confusion regarding constants and variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided algebraic manipulations and integration steps, while others express uncertainty about the next steps. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the constants involved and how to approach the integration process. No consensus has been reached, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that m, K, and k are constants, and there is some confusion about the treatment of these constants in the differentiation and integration processes. The original poster seeks clarification on how to proceed with the problem.

Richter915
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm having some difficulty with a couple of questions, but mainly a problem differentiating an equation:

dP kP (1-P/K)(1-m/P)
-- =
dT

it says to solve it explicitly but I have no idea how to differentiate explicitly.

If you could help me out, it'd be greatly appreciated. Also, if you tell me how to insert the the math operations so it looks normal, it'd be appreciated. Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\frac{dP}{dt} = kP(1-\frac{P}{K})(1-\frac{m}{P})[/tex]

Well unless you left something out, with respect to time, nothing on the right hand side changes, it is all constant. Derivative of a constant is 0.

Anyhow if I am mistaken, explicit derivative is the fancy way of saying 'take the derivative'.
 
no, you are mistaken. I have to find the function that, when you take the derivative of it, gives you that equation. I pretty much have to find what P(t) equals. Thanks anyhow. Oh ya, m, K, and k are constants.
 
Gah nevermind P isn't constant. I can't help you.
 
ya I was just going to point it out...I'll try and post what I have so far and maybe someone can help me from there
 
First, use algebra to show that:

[tex]kP(1-\frac{P}{K})(1-\frac{m}{P}) = -\frac{k}{K}(P - K)(P - m)[/tex]

The differential equation is then:

[tex]\frac{1}{(P - K)(P - m)} dP = -k/K dt[/tex]

Split the integrand on the left hand side using partial fractions, to get:

[tex][\frac{1}{(K-m)(P-K)} + \frac{1}{(m-K)(P - m)}] dP = -\frac{k}{K} dt[/tex]

Integrate both sides...

[tex]\frac{\ln (P-K)}{(K-m)} - \frac{\ln (P - m)}{K - m} = -\frac{k}{K}t + c1[/tex]

Use log rules to combine the logs...

[tex]\frac{1}{K-m} \ln [\frac{P-K}{P-m}] = -\frac{k}{K}t + c1[/tex]

Multiply by (K - m) and take exponentials of both sides...

[tex]\frac{P-K}{P-m} = A \exp (-k + km/K)t[/tex]

Note that A, here, is a constant of integration, which must be determined from the boundary conditions. From here, it is simple algebra to get P as the subject. Doing that gives:

[tex]P(t) = \frac{Am \exp [(-k + km/K)t] - K]}{A \exp[(-k + km/K)t]}[/tex]

If you know one value of P(t), you can determine A, and you're done.
 
what I have so far is:

[tex]dP (K/(K-P)(P-M)) = kt + c[/tex]

no idea where I go from here so...help me out please.
 
wow...thank you...hah.
 
question...why is it -k/K in the first part
 
  • #10
It follows from the algebra. Check the first line of my working.

The way you split the constants between sides of the equation is arbitrary, so my way is not the only way to get to the solution. If you want to leave K on the dP side, as you have done a few posts above this one, that's ok. The working will be a little different, by the answer should be the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K