Solve Net Ionic Equations: Chromium, Aluminium, Zinc

  • Thread starter Thread starter joejo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionic Net
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around writing net ionic equations for reactions involving chromium, aluminum, and zinc with various solutions, including silver nitrate, sulfuric acid, and lead(II) nitrate. Participants are seeking clarification on the correct representation of these equations, particularly regarding state symbols and spectator ions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to write net ionic equations and question the necessity of state symbols. Some express confusion over the role of spectator ions and the correct representation of reactants and products.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exchange of ideas, with some participants providing corrections and suggestions for the equations. Multiple interpretations of the reactions are being explored, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the correct forms of the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are preparing for an upcoming test and are under time constraints, which may influence the urgency and nature of their inquiries. There is also mention of differing notational practices and confusion regarding the representation of ions in the equations.

joejo
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
hi, I'm studying for the chemistry SAT and have a question that I'm not sure that I've done right...can someone please check my answer...thanks in advance!

Write a net ionic equation for the following:

a) Chromium dipped into silver nitrate
b) Aluminmum dropped into a bath of sulphuric acid
c) Zinc dipped into a solution of led (II) nitrate

answers:

a) Cr(s) + Ag+ (aq) --> Cr2+ (aq) + 2Ag (s)
b) d)Al3+ + H2SO4 --> Al2(So4)3 + H2
c) Zn2+ + Pb(NO3)2 --> Zn(NO3)2 + Pb2+

im not sure if I have to have the (s), (aq) etc...

can someone correct my answers if they are wrong...

thanks again
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A looks right. You have state symbols missing from B and in an ionic equation the hydrogen ions are not changing so are not needed (I believe). C also has no symbols and again the lead is not really changing for an ionic equation.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
my friend helped me get a...the answers for b and c are mine...I still don't get it...can you please show me?
 
someone please my test is on thursday i need to study! Thanks guys
 
[tex]2\mbox{Al}_{(\mbox{s})}+6\mbox{H}^{+}_{(\mbox{aq})} \rightarrow 2\mbox{Al}^{3+}_{(\mbox{aq})}+3\mbox{H}_{2}\uparrow[/tex]

(sulphate ions are spectators)

[tex]\mbox{Zn}_{(\mbox{s})}+\mbox{Pb}^{2+}_{(\mbox{aq})}\rightarrow \mbox{Zn}^{2+}_{(\mbox{aq})} +\mbox{Pb}\downarrow[/tex]

(nitrate ions are spectators)


Daniel.
 
And the first one needs another 2.It should read

[tex]\mbox{Cr}_{(\mbox{s})}+2\mbox{Ag}^{+}_{(\mbox{aq})}\rightarrow \mbox{Cr}^{2+}_{(\mbox{aq})}+2\mbox{Ag}\downarrow[/tex]

(Nitrate ions are spectators)


Daniel.
 
b. aluminum into sulfuric acid
If I remember how to do these correctly:
[tex]2Al + 3H_2SO_4 \rightarrow Al_2(SO_4)_3 + 3H_2[/tex]

Break it down into its compounds:

[tex]2Al + 3H_2^+ + 3SO_4^{2-} \rightarrow Al_2^{3+} + (SO_4)_3^{2-} + 3H_2[/tex]

Look on both sides to see if anything is idle during the process. It looks like everythings reacting, even the hydrogens look like theyre doing something, since they go from [itex]H_2^+ \rightarrow H_2[/itex].

I would go to http://www.towson.edu/~ladon/netionic.html for some more help.

edit: Sulfate is spectating as dex said, i didnt see the coefficient. Cros it out
 
The net charge in your equation,in the form written,doesn't add to zero in any of the 2 members,though it should...U have 6 protons from 3 sulphuric acid molecules...They're not 3 molecule-ion of Hydrogen...They have total charge "6+",and not "3+" as your notation would assume...

Daniel.
 
So in this case you would write H as a single atom and not a diatomic? theyre teaching us to always write the diatomics as diatomics. My notation is probably unorthodox but when I counted it it added up right.

[tex]2Al + 3H_2^+ + 3SO_4^{2-} \rightarrow Al_2^{3+} + (SO_4)_3^{2-} + 3H_2[/tex]

Left:
2Al = 0
3H_2 += +6
3SO_4 2- = -6

Right:
Al_2 3+= 6+
SO_4 _3 2- = 6-
H_2 = 0
 
  • #10
That is not diatomic (in the LHS),it's simply 2 [itex]\mbox{H}^{+}[/itex] ions (protons) involved in a chemical bound (covalent,but here we're interested in ionic reactions,though the chemical bounds are not necessarily ionic) with 2 atoms of oxygen from the 4 involved in the sulphate ion...

Notation is essential only when it's wrong.

Daniel.
 
  • #11
Ok I see where I went wrong, thanks. Learn from my mistakes joejo :)
 
  • #12
no u've totally lost me whos right...whozum or dexter...

dexter your right, right??
 
  • #13
>50% of the time,this one included :wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #14
thanks guys...


i don't get u dexter...are you saying ur guessing?
 
  • #15
dexters always right.
he has a phd in everything.
 
  • #16
thank a lot guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
37K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
10K