Electric Potential Energy problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two charged particles, one positive and one negative, and their motion under the influence of electric potential energy as they are released from rest at a distance apart. The objective is to determine their speeds when they are half the initial separation distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of electric potential energy and kinetic energy relationships, questioning the application of various equations related to energy conservation.
  • Some participants explore the potential energy at different distances and how it translates into kinetic energy as the particles move closer.
  • There are attempts to clarify the correct charge to use in the equations and the implications of voltage cancellation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing different equations and approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between potential energy and kinetic energy, but there is no clear consensus on the correct method or outcome yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through various equations and concepts related to electric potential energy and kinetic energy, indicating some confusion about the application of these principles in the context of the problem.

futron
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
"Two particles each have a mass of 6.1*10-3 kg. One has a charge of +5.0*10-6 C, and the other has a charge of -5.0*10-6 C. They are initially held at rest at a distance of 0.80 m apart. Both are then released and accelerate toward each other. How fast is each particle moving when the separation between them is one-half its initial value?"

What equations would I need to use in order to solve this problem? I tried using EPE/q=Va-Vb, but the voltage cancels out, so I'm unsure as to where to go from there. Thanks.

~Futron
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use kinetic and potential energy relationships. Initially they both have no kinetic energy, but a certain amount of potential energy. When d = d/2 they have a certain about of potential and kinetic energy. Find the potential energy in both cases, any potential energy lost would have been translated into kinetic energy.
 
Alright, I tried using EPEi=EPEf+(1/2)mv^2 where EPE=q0*(Va-Vb), but that doesn't seem to work. Any ideas?
 
[itex]EPE_f-EPE_i = mv^2/2, and EPE = q(V_b-V_a)[/itex] are the amended versions of your equations. Find the potential with [itex]U = qE\Delta x[/itex]

This will take you in circles though.

The force between the charges is given by coulombs law. Find the difference in potential energy at d = r and d = r/2.
 
So if I have [itex]EPE_a-EPE_b=q_0(V_A-V_B)[/itex] where [itex]V=kQ/r[/itex], how would I then find the difference between the two when the distance is halved?
 
[itex]U = qE\Delta x[/itex]

The field for point charges is [itex]E = \frac{kq}{r^2}[/itex]

[tex]\Delta x_i = 0.8m, \Delta x_f = 0.4m[/tex]
 
Thanks, but I'm still not getting the correct answer. Which charge should I use for [itex]q[/itex] in [itex]EPE=qE\Delta x[/itex], and once I get that, would it simply be a matter of solving [itex]EPE_f-EPE_i=(1/2)mv^2[/itex]?
 
Can you show some work? In your first post you said the voltages cancel out which isn't correct, this would only happen if [itex]V_b = v_a[/itex] which isn't true.

Show me where your messing up, all these techniques should give the same answer, if you prefer voltages we can use that.
 
Alright, I tried using EPEf-EPEi=(1/2)mv^2 where EPEf=(5x10^-6)((9*10^9)*(-5*10^-6)/0.4)) and EPEi=(5*10^-6)x((9x10^9)(-5x10^-6)/0.8)), but that gives 5.43m/s, which is not the correct answer.
 
  • #10
I think that the potential energy state is [tex]U=k_{e}q_1q_2/r[/tex], you'll need to find [tex]\Delta U=k_eq_1q_2(1/r_{initial}~-1/r_{final})[/tex], this will equal the negative value of the change in kinetic energy [tex]=-mv^{2}_{final}-0[/tex]
 
  • #11
Thanks! I was jumbling too many equations together at once but that made it much clearer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K