Double Slit Interference: Wavelength & Central Maximum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double slit interference problem involving two lasers with different wavelengths. Participants are exploring the relationship between the wavelengths of the lasers and the positions of their interference maxima and minima on a screen located a distance L from the slits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine which laser's first maximum is closer to the central maximum and are questioning the significance of wavelength in this context. There are inquiries about the formulas for locating maxima and minima, as well as the definitions of these terms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between path difference and the positions of maxima and minima. Others are seeking clarification on the application of formulas and the interpretation of the central maximum and minima locations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the use of integers for m in the context of maxima and minima.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions and calculations related to maxima and minima, as well as the specific values of m used in the formulas. Participants are encouraged to apply numerical values to better understand the relationships involved.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Two lasers are shining on a double slit, with slit separation d. Laser one has a wavelength of d/20, while laser two has a wavelength of d/15 . The lasers produce separate interference patterns on a screen a large distance L away from the slits.

Which laser has its first maximum closer to the central maximum?

I read that the first maximum comes when the path difference between the two slits is equal to one full wavelength. What does this have to do with the laser that has a smaller wavelength (laser 1)? The distance from the central maximum is proportional to the path-difference, but I stiill don't understand exactly what the central maximum is.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soaring Crane said:
Two lasers are shining on a double slit, with slit separation d. Laser one has a wavelength of d/20, while laser two has a wavelength of d/15 . The lasers produce separate interference patterns on a screen a large distance L away from the slits.

Which laser has its first maximum closer to the central maximum?

I read that the first maximum comes when the path difference between the two slits is equal to one full wavelength. What does this have to do with the laser that has a smaller wavelength (laser 1)? The distance from the central maximum is proportional to the path-difference, but I stiill don't understand exactly what the central maximum is.

Any help is appreciated.
Laser one will have the first maximum that is closest to the bright centre.

The central maximum is the point where the light shins straight through the slits and hits the screen. This is when the path difference is 0.

As the path difference of the next bright point is when the wavelengths are one out of each other the shorter laser will be constructively interferred with first. The longer wavelength will do the same but further away.

If you are really stuck, apply numbers into the problem and see what you find or ask some more questions. I don't know what it is you are not understanding.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
How do you find the minimum of a laser in terms of L? I am trying to find the third minimum's location of laser 2 and I know m is 2, but I don't know what formula to use aside from y = [m(lambda)*L]/d, which is for the maximum or 2L/15. What do I do?
 
For two-slit interference, the minima are located halfway between the maxima. You can locate them by using half-integers for m: 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 etc.
 
I'm not sure that I understand this method. I better type out the whole problem, so you can see my current solutions.

What is the distance between the second maximum of laser one and the third minimum of laser two, on the same side of the central maximum?

If the central maximum corresponds to m = 0 , then you should be able to figure out what the second maximum corresponds to. Using that, the distance to the second maximum of laser one from the central maximum is L/10 or L/9.95.

The first minimum corresponds to m = 0 (since there is no central minimum). The value of m for the third minimum is m = 2 (m is always an integer).

Now the part that I am trying to figure out:
Given that m = 2, what is the location of the third minimum?

Once I find this value, I can subtract this from the second maximum to find the distance between both locations.
 
Soaring Crane said:
The first minimum corresponds to m = 0 (since there is no central minimum). The value of m for the third minimum is m = 2 (m is always an integer).

That means they're assuming the following formula for the minima:

[tex]y = \frac {(m + 1/2) \lambda L} {d}[/tex]
 
So I must use this to find the third minimum's location?
 
In the formula I gave you, m = 0 gives you the first minimum (on either side of the central maximum), m = 1 gives you the second minimum, etc.

Notice the pattern:

[itex]0(\lambda L / d)[/itex] gives the central (zero'th) maximum.

[itex]0.5 (\lambda L / d)[/itex] gives the first minimum away from the center.

[itex]1 (\lambda L / d)[/itex] gives the first maximum away from the center.

[itex]1.5 (\lambda L / d)[/itex] gives the second minimum away from the center.

[itex]2 (\lambda L / d)[/itex] gives the second maximum away from the center.

Etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K