Parallel RL Circuit: Get Help with AC Supply & Differential Equation
- Thread starter ng
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Circuit Parallel Rl circuit
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the analysis of a parallel RL circuit connected to an AC supply, focusing on the formulation and solution of the associated differential equations. Participants explore transient and steady-state responses, including the use of specific solution forms for the differential equations.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks help with the differential equation governing a parallel RL circuit under AC supply conditions.
- Another participant suggests a resource but acknowledges it may not be sufficient for transient solutions.
- Discussion includes the formulation of the differential equation as L(di/dt) + Ri = RIcos(ωt) and the need for both homogeneous and particular solutions.
- Participants propose that the particular solution can be assumed in the form of i = Acos(ωt + φ) or i = Acos(ωt) + Bsin(ωt), with some questioning the necessity of the phase term φ.
- There is a debate about the appropriateness of using cosine versus sine functions in the solution, with explanations provided regarding their equivalence and the implications of differentiation.
- Participants discuss the method of undetermined coefficients for finding the values of A and φ, as well as the coefficients in second-order equations.
- One participant expresses confusion about the initial conditions and the application of the differential equation in different scenarios (AC vs. DC).
- There are corrections and refinements to earlier claims, particularly regarding the formulation of the total solution and the initial conditions for the inductor current.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the methods for solving the differential equations, with some confusion remaining about the assumptions made in the solutions. Multiple competing views exist regarding the forms of the solutions and the treatment of initial conditions.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include unresolved assumptions about initial conditions and the specific forms of the solutions. The discussion reflects a mix of first and second-order circuit analysis without consensus on the best approach for all scenarios.
- 22,622
- 7,645
- 31
- 0
The problem is with getting the transient solution.
RC parallel -If the input is Vcoswt then current throu R will be V/Rcoswt.throu C is
-CwV sinwtThis is te steady state i understand.But the transient and getting to it throu te differential equations is my problem for both RL and Rc parallel across ac supply.
- 22,622
- 7,645
V = VR(t) = VL(t) = L [itex]\frac{di(t)}{dt}[/itex] = ( I(t) - i(t) )/R,
but I(t) = V(t)/R + i(t), and let i(t) = VL/ZL where Z is the impedance.
Also consider i(t) = io cos ([itex]\omega[/itex] t + [itex]\theta[/itex]), where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the phase angle.
The voltages are in phase, the currents are out of phase.
Evaluate at time, t = 0.
See if that helps.
[tex]L\frac{di}{dt} + Ri = RIcos\omega t[/tex].
This is a non homogeneous differential equation. Find the solution of the homogeneous equation iH(t) and a particular solution that will be of the form iP(t) = Acos(ωt + φ).
The general solution is i(t) = iH(t) + iP(t)
Replacing the initial conditions you have the solution. It contains two terms: the exponential term is the transient and the cosine term is the steady state.
- 31
- 0
thanx again.
- 320
- 0
Apply KCL at the top supernode and you have
[tex]I_{in} = i_R + i_L + i_c[/tex]
Note, that all cicuit components have the same potential and recall that
[itex]L \frac {di_L}{dt} = v_L[/itex] and [itex]C \frac {dv_c}{dt} = i_c[/itex]
- 31
- 0
hmm... okay.but i was wondering why shud i assume the solution
Acos(wt+Phi)?
Is this what is assumed for first order circuits subject to ac supply?i read its Acoswt+Bsinwt for second order circuits.am i right?
- 320
- 0
- 31
- 0
Okay
so i get
Ldi/dt+Ri=RIcoswt
to get the complementary solution assume
Ldi/dt+Ri=0
int di/i=- intR/L dt
ln i= -R/Lt+K
i=exp(-t/tau+k)
at t=0 initial condition i is V/R
then its..?is it right?
for particular solution i assume i=Acoswt
putting in first eqn
-Lwsinwt+RAcoswt=RIcoswt...
where am i going wrong?
please help.
Both solutions can be used with first and second order circuits (or higher orders). They are equivalent.ng said:thanx for the reply, corneo
hmm... okay.but i was wondering why shud i assume the solution
Acos(wt+Phi)?
Is this what is assumed for first order circuits subject to ac supply?i read its Acoswt+Bsinwt for second order circuits.am i right?
![]()
[tex]Acos(\omega t + \phi) = Acos\omega t cos\phi - Asin\omega t sin\phi = A_1 cos\omega t + A_2 sin\omega t[/tex]
where
[tex]A_1 = Acos\phi[/tex]
[tex]A_2 = -Asin\phi[/tex]
- 31
- 0
but ...heheh
You replace the solution and its derivative in the differential equation. When expanding the sine and the cosine of [tex]\omega t + \phi[/tex], you will have in both members of the equation terms in sine and in cosine. Equalling the coefficients of like terms you get the two unknowns A and [tex]\phi[/tex].ng said:Okay i get it.thanx SGT.
but ...hehehhow do u find the value of A?
- 31
- 0
So,
for particular solution i assume i=Acoswt
putting in first eqn
Ldi/dt+Ri=RIcoswt
-Lwsinwt+RAcoswt=RIcoswt
equating the coefficients on LHS and RHS
looks like i am going wrong...is it?
please help.
No, you put [tex]i = Acos(\omega t + \phi)[/tex]ng said:SGT,Thanx again a lot!
So,
for particular solution i assume i=Acoswt
putting in first eqn
Ldi/dt+Ri=RIcoswt
-Lwsinwt+RAcoswt=RIcoswt
equating the coefficients on LHS and RHS
looks like i am going wrong...is it?
please help.
or [tex]i = Acos(\omega t) + Bsin(\omega t)[/tex]
calculate [tex]\frac{di}{dt}[/tex]
and replace i and [tex]\frac{di}{dt}[/tex] in the equation.
- 31
- 0
SGT...thanx a million.
i hope i am right this time...
-L(Awsinwt+Bwcoswt)+R(Acoswt+Bsinwt)=RIcoswt
(-LBw+RA)coswt=RIcoswt
-LBw+RA=RI
-LAw+RB=0
solve this to get A and B
w=2 pi f
this approach is used for second order also right?
thankyou once again!

- 31
- 0
why can't it be Acoswt?why the phi?
why shud it be coswt?why not sinwt?
(am i being really stupid?
When you differentiate cosωt you get -sinωt. If you replace both in the equation you get a term in sinωt in one side that must be equalled to zero on the other side, this is inconsistent. Just try it in your equation and you will see.ng said:just one more question...
why can't it be Acoswt?why the phi?
why shud it be coswt?why not sinwt?
(am i being really stupid?)
Of course you can use the sine instead of the cosine, they are the same function, only with different phases.
cosωt = sin(π/2 - ωt)
- 31
- 0
Is this used in second order equations as well?
hmm... an underdamped case for instance
there r two coefficients in it right?
how is that found?
i hope i am notgetting onto ur nerves!
thankyou for all the help.
Both in first and second order equations the steady state response to a sinusoidal input have two parameters to be evaluated: A and φ or A1 and A2.ng said:okay i understand.
Is this used in second order equations as well?
hmm... an underdamped case for instance
there r two coefficients in it right?
how is that found?
i hope i am notgetting onto ur nerves!
thankyou for all the help.
You have two equations: one with the coeficients of the terms in sine and one with the coeficients of the terms in cosine. Two equations, two unknowns ...
- 31
- 0
For example,
The overdamped case has the solution
v=A1exp(s1t)+A2exp(s2t)
and the equation is of the form
series rlc
L d^2i/dt +Rdi/dt +i/C=dV/dt
cud u please help me?
The solution you gave is of the homogeneous equation. The total solution is the sum of iH and iP.ng said:thanx for the quick response.
For example,
The overdamped case has the solution
v=A1exp(s1t)+A2exp(s2t)
and the equation is of the form
series rlc
L d^2i/dt +Rdi/dt +i/C=dV/dt
cud u please help me?
[tex]i = A_1 e^{s_1 t} + A_2 e^{s_2 t} + K cos(\omega t + \phi)[/tex]
- 31
- 0
You obtain the derivative [tex]\frac{di_L}{dt}[/tex] and then replace the initial values [tex]i_L (0)[/tex] and [tex]\frac{di_L}{dt}(0)[/tex] in the equations.ng said:yes,but how to find the values of A1 and A2?
- 31
- 0
L d^2i/dt +Rdi/dt +i/C=dV/dt
i=A1exp(s1t)+A2exp(s2t)
di/dt=s1A1exp(s1t)+s2A2exp(s2t)
d^2i/dt^2= s1^2A1exp(s1t)+s2^2A2exp(s2t)
i(0)=V/R
if its dc dV/dt=0
ac then dV/dt=-Awsinwt+wBcoswt
is this going wrong?
ng said:V=Acos(wt+phi)=Acoswt+Bsinwt
L d^2i/dt +Rdi/dt +i/C=dV/dt
i=A1exp(s1t)+A2exp(s2t)
di/dt=s1A1exp(s1t)+s2A2exp(s2t)
d^2i/dt^2= s1^2A1exp(s1t)+s2^2A2exp(s2t)
i(0)=V/R
if its dc dV/dt=0
ac then dV/dt=-Awsinwt+wBcoswt
is this going wrong?
It's wrong!
i(0) is the current in the inductor prior to the application of the excitation.
[tex]\frac{di}{dt}(0)[/tex] is the derivative of the current in the inductor prior to the application of the excitation.
Since [tex]v_L(t) = L\frac{di}{dt}[/tex], we can say that
[tex]\frac{di}{dt}(0) = \frac{v_L(0)}{L}[/tex]
- 31
- 0
What part of the equations you don't understand?ng said:I am sorry but I donno how to go abt with the equations.
- 31
- 0
i understood quite a few things from ur replies but not how to reach the
final equations.i am going wrong whenever i try it.
so cud u please help out?thanku again
[tex]i_P = K cos(\omega t + \phi) = A cos \omega t + B sin \omega t[/tex]
You differentiate it two times and replace [tex]i_P[/tex] and its two derivatives in the differential equation:
[tex]L\ddot i_P + R\dot i_P + \frac{i_P}{C} = \frac{dV}{dt}[/tex]
You can calculate the two unknowns: [tex]K[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] or [tex]A[/tex] and [tex]B[/tex].
You have the solution of the homogeneous equation, for instance in the overdamped case:
[tex]i_H = A_1 e^{s_1 t} + A_2 e^{s_2 t}[/tex].
The general solution is:
[tex]i = i_H + i_P = A_1 e^{s_1 t} + A_2 e^{s_2 t} + K cos(\omega t + \phi)[/tex]
You differentiate it to get [tex]\dot i[/tex]
In order to calculate [tex]A_1[/tex] and [tex]A_2[/tex] you must have the initial values of the current and its derivative: [tex]i(0)[/tex] and [tex]\dot i(0)[/tex]
You make t = 0 in the equations of the current and its derivative and set them to the initial values. You have two equations in two unknowns.
Similar threads
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 17 ·
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 4 ·
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 1 ·
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 8 ·
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 15 ·
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 4K