Can This Hard Integral Problem Be Solved With Complex Numbers?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter infirmus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) to a specific integral problem involving the function f(x) = ∫43x3 cos(t2) dt. Participants explore the differentiation of this integral and the implications of the FTC, while also addressing related concepts such as Leibniz's rule.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the derivative f'(x) can be found using the FTC, stating f'(x) = 3x2 cos(x6).
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the FTC and acknowledges the correctness of the previous answer.
  • A participant challenges the interpretation of the FTC, arguing that the constant term should not be included in the differentiation process.
  • Some participants discuss the application of Leibniz's rule for differentiating integrals with variable limits, proposing various forms of the derivative.
  • There is a discussion about the inclusion of partial derivatives in the context of differentiating integrals, with one participant referencing MathWorld for clarification.
  • Another participant raises a question about the signs in the application of the chain rule, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the constants involved.
  • One participant introduces complex exponentials in relation to the integral, suggesting a possible approach to solving the integral problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the FTC and Leibniz's rule, with some agreeing on certain interpretations while others challenge them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct application of these mathematical principles.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the treatment of constants during differentiation and the implications of applying the chain rule in this context. Additionally, the discussion includes varying interpretations of the FTC and Leibniz's rule, which may depend on specific definitions and assumptions.

infirmus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me a hand with this problem - Its screwing with my head! :frown:

The derivative of the function [itex]f(x) = \int_{43}^{x^3}\cos(t^2){dt}[/itex] is:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: fundamental theorem of calculus..
 
If I recall the FTC then it should be

[tex]f'(x) = 3x^2 \cos x^6[/tex]
 
Dam don't even remember what FTC is... I remember hearing bout it.. :rolleyes:

I guess I'll go read up my textbook.

Corneo - that's the correct answer...

Thanks guys, great help.
 
Fundamental theorem of calculus says:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{a}^{x} f(t) dt = f(x)[/tex]

So applying it to this problem, we have a = 43, and x = x^3
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{43}^{x^3} \cos t^2 dt = f(x^3)[/tex]

Since the upper limit is a function of x, the chain rule is applied. The FTOC with the chain rule is:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_a^{g(x)} f(t) dt = f(g(x))g'(x)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{43}^{x^3} \cos t^2 dt = \cos \left((x^3)^2\right) 3x^2 = 3x^2\cos (x^6)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Hmm, I feel really stupid... :shy:

Ahh well. its all good. Thanks.
 
Whozum,you're completely incorrect.

Denoting the antiderivative of f(t) by F(t),what's this equal to ?

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\left[ F(t)\left|_{t=a}\right \right][/tex]

According to you,it's f(a).According to me,it's 0.

So what's the constant doing in the last line...?Was it there a linear term in "x" before differentiation...?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Whozum,you're completely incorrect.
I wouldn't say that it was completely incorrect. A bit hard to understand maybe, but I got the gist of it... Not using capital F's for integrals didnt help. He did say:
whozum said:
Since the upper limit is a function of x, the chain rule is applied. f(43) is omitted since it is a constant.
F(43) is a constant, and so its derivative is 0 and can be ommited.
 
All his 4 formulae (written in LaTex) are incorrect.So he was completely incorrect.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Tell you what Infirmus, check out Leibnitz rule and kindly solve the following:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{u(x)}^{v(x)} f(x,t)dt[/tex]

You can do it I bet! Just follow the rules and do all the differentiations. The answer is impressive. And after that, just come up with some examples for the functions and do some real ones, say:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{x^2}^{e^x} (x^2t+xtSin[x]) dt[/tex]
 
  • #11
saltydog said:
Tell you what Infirmus, check out Leibnitz rule and kindly solve the following:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{u(x)}^{v(x)} f(x,t)dt[/tex]

You can do it I bet! Just follow the rules and do all the differentiations. The answer is impressive. And after that, just come up with some examples for the functions and do some real ones, say:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{x^2}^{e^x} (x^2t+xtSin[x]) dt[/tex]

It seems to me that [tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{u(x)}^{v(x)} f(x,t)dt[/tex] would be [tex]f(v(x),t)\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-f(u(x),t)\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}[/tex] but that isn't the answer, is it?
 
  • #12
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
It seems to me that [tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_{u(x)}^{v(x)} f(x,t)dt[/tex] would be [tex]f(v(x),t)\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-f(u(x),t)\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}[/tex] but that isn't the answer, is it?

No Alex, that's not quite right. Remember, the integration is being done with respect to t and so at some point, you'll get a function in t that you then substitute v(x) and u(x) where ever t occurs. So if anything, it would include expressions such as:

[tex]f(x,u(x))[/tex]

and:

[tex]f(x,v(x))[/tex]

right?

But there are some other components also.
 
  • #13
Right, I don't know why I did that. Anyways, I can understand that part, it's just that I can't get past why there is this:

[tex]\int_{u(x)}^{v(x)}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dt[/tex]

added to the answer.

I think this is the answer:

[tex]\int_{u(x)}^{v(x)}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dt+f(x,v(x))\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-f(x,u(x))\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}[/tex]

according to MathWorld.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

--Alex
 
Last edited:
  • #14
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
Right, I don't know why I did that. Anyways, I can understand that part, it's just that I can't get past why there is this:

[tex]\int_{u(x)}^{v(x)}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dt[/tex]

added to the answer.

I think this is the answer:

[tex]\int_{u(x)}^{v(x)}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dt+f(x,v(x))\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}-f(x,u(x))\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}[/tex]

according to MathWorld.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

--Alex

Very good Alex. Suppose we have:

[tex]H(u,v,x)=u^2+2uv+x[/tex]

with:

[tex]u=f(x);\quad v=g(x)[/tex]

Then:

[tex]\frac{dH}{dx}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial u} \frac{du}{dx}+\frac{\partial H}{\partial v} \frac{dv}{dx}+\frac{dH}{dx}[/tex]

So let:

[tex]H(u,v,x)=\int_{v(x)}^{u(x)} f(x,t) dt[/tex]
 
  • #15
Alright, I guess I didn't think to write it out that way. So the part I was confused about comes from the [tex]\frac{dH}{dx}[/tex] at the end right?

Thanks again,

--Alex.
 
  • #16
I amended the post, is that better for you dex?
 
  • #17
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
Alright, I guess I didn't think to write it out that way. So the part I was confused about comes from the [tex]\frac{dH}{dx}[/tex] at the end right?

Thanks again,

--Alex.

The final partial treats u and v as constants. Justifications are needed to switch the order of limits but its:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\int_v^u f(x,t)dt=\int_v^u\mathop\lim\limits_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+h,t)-f(x,t)}{h} dt=\int_v^u \frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x,t)dt[/tex]
 
  • #18
saltydog said:
Very good Alex. Suppose we have:

[tex]H(u,v,x)=u^2+2uv+x[/tex]

with:

[tex]u=f(x);\quad v=g(x)[/tex]

Then:

[tex]\frac{dH}{dx}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial u} \frac{du}{dx}+\frac{\partial H}{\partial v} \frac{dv}{dx}+\frac{dH}{dx}[/tex]

So let:

[tex]H(u,v,x)=\int_{v(x)}^{u(x)} f(x,t) dt[/tex]

Sorry to bring it up again, but everything comes out correctly except for the sign when I use the chain rule. I come up with the same thing, but every term is added (just like the chain rule is written). Why is this?
 
  • #19
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
Sorry to bring it up again, but everything comes out correctly except for the sign when I use the chain rule. I come up with the same thing, but every term is added (just like the chain rule is written). Why is this?

Hello Alex:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_x^k f(t)dt=-f(x)[/tex]
 
  • #20
Ah right. I wasn't treating "u" as a constant. Thanks again.
 
  • #21
not quite sure, but would the following help in solving this integral?

[tex]e^{it^{2}}~=~cost^{2}+isint^{2}~,~e^{-it^{2}}~=~cost^{2}-isint^{2}[/tex]

[tex]e^{it^{2}}-e^{-it^{2}}=2cost^{2}~,~(e^{it^{2}}-e^{-it{2}})/2=cost^{2}}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K