What Is the Minimum Tension Needed to Move a Toaster on a Countertop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rlmurra2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum tension required to move a toaster on a countertop, considering the forces acting on the toaster, including static friction and gravitational force. The problem involves analyzing the angle at which the tension should be applied and the corresponding tension needed to initiate movement.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between tension, angle, and static friction, questioning how to find one variable without knowing the other. There are attempts to set up equilibrium equations for both horizontal and vertical forces, and some participants express confusion about the relevance of certain forces and components.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the equilibrium conditions and the necessary equations to relate the forces. There is ongoing exploration of the derivatives to find the angle that minimizes tension, with some participants seeking clarification on specific steps in the reasoning process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the toaster is not plugged in and are using the coefficient of static friction provided. There is a focus on the limiting equilibrium condition just before the toaster begins to move.

rlmurra2
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This one's not too hard...A 1.30kg toaster is not plugged in. The coeffficient of static friction b/t the toaster and horizontal countertop is .350. To make the toaster start moving, you carelessly pull on its electric cord. a) for the cord tension to be as small as possible, you should pull at what angle above the horizontal? b) With this angle, how large must the tension be?

Ok so I have Tcos(theta)-fs-mg

fs=force of static friction fs=uk*n = (.350)(1.30kg)(9.80m/s^2)=4.459 N
mg=12.74 N
Tcos(theta)-4.459N-12.74N ...my question is, I am not sure how to solve tension or angle without having one or the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the other component of the tension? You've got [itex]T\cos \theta - F_{s} - mg[/itex], why is the mg there? You also need an equals sign in that expression because it doesn't really mean anything on its own.
 
Ok so [itex]T\cos \theta - F_{s} - mg[/itex] = ma...but would be normal force be relevant?? I still don't know how to find the angle, without knowing the tension..
 
The angle and the tension are the two unknowns you are trying to find. Write down the conditions for equilibrium for horizontal and vertical components. Solve those two equations for the two unknowns.

As always, start by identifying each force on the object. Then find the horizontal and vertical components of each force.
 
I feel like I'm going in a big circle here.
 
Vertically:
[tex]Tsin\theta+N-mg=0[/tex]
where N is the normal force by the floor upwards, so
[tex]N = mg-Tsin\theta[/tex]
horizontally:
[tex]Tcos\theta - \mu N = 0[/tex]
substitute for N from the first equation, express T in terms of theta,
[tex]T=\frac{\mu mg}{cos\theta + \mu sin \theta}[/tex]
minimum T is when [itex]\frac {dT}{d\theta}=0[/itex]
So,
[tex]\frac{dT}{d\theta}=\frac{-\mu mg (-sin\theta + \mu cos\theta)}<br /> {(cos\theta + \mu sin\theta)^2}[/tex]
For this to be zero, the numerator must be zero,
[tex]-sin\theta+\mu cos\theta = 0[/tex]
giving angle [itex]\theta=19.3^o[/itex]

please tell me if this is wrong.
 
Fx=Tcos(x)-fs=max Tcos(x)=max+fs -> T=max+fs/cos(x)
Fy=n-mg=may n=may-mg = m(ay - g)

?
 
what do you mean?
i use limiting equilibrium assumption
 
rlmurra2 said:
I feel like I'm going in a big circle here.
Maybe so, but first you have to get the correct equations for equilibrium.

Sniffer did the work for you.
 
  • #10
sniffer said:
what do you mean?
i use limiting equilibrium assumption

Sorry I posted that after I saw your post.
 
  • #11
rlmurra2 said:
Fx=Tcos(x)-fs=max Tcos(x)=max+fs -> T=max+fs/cos(x)
Fy=n-mg=may n=may-mg = m(ay - g)

?
Just before the system begins to move it is still in equilibrium. The static friction will be at its maximum value, thus equal to [itex]\mu N[/itex]. The acceleration is zero.

Your equation for Fy is missing the vertical component of the tension.
 
  • #12
sniffer said:
Vertically:
[tex]Tsin\theta+N-mg=0[/tex]
where N is the normal force by the floor upwards, so
[tex]N = mg-Tsin\theta[/tex]
horizontally:
[tex]Tcos\theta - \mu N = 0[/tex]
substitute for N from the first equation, express T in terms of theta,
[tex]T=\frac{\mu mg}{cos\theta + \mu sin \theta}[/tex]
minimum T is when [itex]\frac {dT}{d\theta}=0[/itex]
So,
[tex]\frac{dT}{d\theta}=\frac{-\mu mg (-sin\theta + \mu cos\theta)}<br /> {(cos\theta + \mu sin\theta)^2}[/tex]
For this to be zero, the numerator must be zero,
[tex]-sin\theta+\mu cos\theta = 0[/tex]
giving angle [itex]\theta=19.3^o[/itex]
please tell me if this is wrong.

Ok I am getting this now...I just don't understand at the part where the numerator has to be 0, where does the [tex]\frac{dT}{d\theta}=\frac{-\mu mg (-sin\theta + \mu cos\theta)}<br /> {(cos\theta + \mu sin\theta)^2}[/tex]
For this to be zero, the numerator must be zero,
[tex]-sin\theta+\mu cos\theta = 0[/tex] come from?
 
  • #13
To find the minima (or maxima) of a function, set its first derivative equal to zero. (The first step is to write the tension as a function of angle.)
 
  • #14
Tcos(x)-u(mg-Tsin(x)=0
Tcos(x)-umg+uTsin(x)=0
Tcos(x)+uTsin(x)=umg
T(cos(x)+usin(x))=umg
T=umg/(cos(x)+usin(x) T=(.350)(1.30kg)(9.80m/s^2)/cos(x)+.350sin(x)

This is where I am at, I understand the part that comes next, where it comes from.
 
  • #15
rlmurra2 said:
Tcos(x)-u(mg-Tsin(x)=0
Tcos(x)-umg+uTsin(x)=0
Tcos(x)+uTsin(x)=umg
T(cos(x)+usin(x))=umg
T=umg/(cos(x)+usin(x)
This is good. Now to find the angle that minimizes the needed tension, take the derivative as sniffer showed.

T=(.350)(1.30kg)(9.80m/s^2)/cos(x)+.350sin(x)
I would not plug in numbers until the very last step.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K