Quantum Weirdness: Solving the Measurement Problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential of string theory and quantum gravity (QG) to address the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Participants highlight that while quantum gravity may introduce new instances of quantum weirdness, it does not explicitly promise resolutions to the interpretation riddles of quantum mechanics. The conversation emphasizes the limitations of traditional manifold spacetimes used in string theory and quantum field theory, suggesting that the development of non-manifold spacetimes in QG could lead to new insights. A humorous reference to an upcoming conference presentation by Prof. Fotini Markopoulou on non-locality further illustrates the complexities involved in understanding emergent spacetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts
  • Knowledge of quantum gravity theories
  • Basic grasp of non-manifold spacetime models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the foundations of quantum mechanics and its interpretations
  • Explore the implications of non-manifold spacetime in quantum gravity
  • Study quantum information theory and its relation to quantum weirdness
  • Attend conferences on emergent spacetime and non-locality in quantum theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the intersection of quantum gravity and foundational issues in quantum theory.

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
Has string theory or any other quantum-gravity theory the potential or the intention solving quantum weirdness (measurement problem, quantum reality)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratzinger said:
Has string theory or any other quantum-gravity theory the potential or the intention solving quantum weirdness (measurement problem, quantum reality)?

Hi Ratzinger, always nice to hear from you, and think of Acapulco.
my understanding is that weirdness is dealt with in other lines of research like FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
and Quantum Information/Quantum Computing.

In Quantum Gravity you may get people ENCOUNTERING new instances of weirdness, as they try to build a model around the shape of the universe, and they may occasionally bark their shins on new weirdness and stumble on it. I COULD BE MISSING SOMETHING but I don't hear QG people promising that they are going to resolve the Riddles of Interpretation and all that.

Maybe they will by accident. Because it looks like QG is being forced to invent a new non-manifold kind of spacetime. The old manifold-type spacetimes used in String Theory and Quantum Field Theory, the routine setups used for perturbative approximations, seem finally IMHO just not working well enough. And these are the spacetimes that Quantum Theories have always been done on. So, it could be that when the QG people have a non-manifold spacetime they will find that formulating fields on that new model will make some of the quantum oddities go away.

BTW in a humorous note, here is something from next months conference outside Berlin:

HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE NON-LOCALITY

Prof. Fotini Markopoulou
Emergent spacetime
Abstract: How I learned to stop worrying and love non-locality, It appears unavoidable that schemes of spacetime emerging as the low-energy description of a microscopic background-independent theory run into trouble with locality. We review the problem. Since it is very generic, we argue that we should look for ways to use it rather than avoid it. In particular, we investigate applications of this idea to cosmology.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K