What is the Maximum Possible Length of a Radio Wave?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The Guru Kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the maximum possible length of a radio wave, exploring concepts related to electromagnetic wavelengths, the observable universe, and theoretical limits imposed by physics. Participants engage in a mix of theoretical exploration and technical reasoning, addressing both empirical and conceptual aspects of the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the concept of the longest possible electromagnetic wavelength may refer to the observable universe rather than the entire universe.
  • One participant introduces the Hubble photon wavelength formula and questions the wavelength of the corresponding photon.
  • Another participant proposes that the highest possible wavelength could be a standing wave that is indistinguishable from the local background, raising questions about energy and measurement limits.
  • There is mention of a theoretical infrared cutoff, though its firmness is debated, with some participants expressing skepticism about existing theories of quantum gravity.
  • A participant posits that the lowest electromagnetic wavelength could be represented by a one-dimensional string vibrating at the Planck level, while another counters this claim based on empirical tests.
  • Discussion includes the idea that a photon is a four-dimensional entity, leading to claims about the radius of the observable universe and its relationship to the Hubble length.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the relevance of discussing the longest photon wavelength in relation to the original question.
  • One participant suggests a 'what if?' exploration of the topic, while another emphasizes the physical possibilities and limitations imposed by plasma frequency on the propagation of long wavelengths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the topic, with no clear consensus reached. Disagreements arise regarding the interpretation of theoretical models, the relevance of certain claims, and the implications of empirical evidence.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved definitions of the universe's boundaries, the dependence on theoretical models for electromagnetic wavelengths, and the ambiguity surrounding the empirical validity of certain claims.

The Guru Kid
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I was researching about the highest possible EM wavelength and came across "the length of the universe" concept.

Is it just the length of the visible universe? or the universe possible?

thanx
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think it maybe stating the known universe a.k.a the observable universe. :/
 
Photon Phantom...


Longest photon wavelength?

Hubble photon wavelength:
[tex]r_u = \lambda_{\gamma}[/tex]
[tex]\lambda_{\gamma} = \frac{c}{H_o}[/tex]

[tex]H_o[/tex] - Hubble Constant

What is the 'wavelength' of this photon?
 
Last edited:
Check out this thread.
 
The highest possible wavelength is a standing wave (WRT to your frame of reference). It would be indistinguishable from the your local backgound, and therefor not measurable by you, regardless of how much energy the wave might contain.

Interestingly, quantum physics says that the energy of the vacuum is 120 OOM larger than we can measure. Sometimes, a UV cutoff is proposed to cut this discrepancy back by about 60 OOM (yeah!). I find it curious that these same folks do not propose an IR (actually much lower frequency!) cutoff where huge energies might be expressed at wavelengths too long for us to detect.
 
Turbo, as you know, there is a theoretical IR cutoff, but not very firm. We run up against these kind of walls all the time - largely, IMO, because we have no viable quantum theory of gravity. Personally, I think both theories are incomplete. I hasten to add, however, I believe both theories are correct within their own domain [my inner crackpot is showing].
 
so the lowest EM wavelength would be an open 1d string vibrating as a photon at Planck level ?
 
No. Empirical tests deny the 1d result at around 4 sigma levels.
 
I thought it would be lower than that !
 
  • #10

A photon is a 4 dimensional entity, (3 space + 1 time) therefore no photon can exist below D = 4.

Marcus said:
the radius of the observable universe is about 3 times the Hubble length. (the current distance to galaxies and stuff with we are now getting light from goes out to 40 some billion LY or roughly 3 times)

'observable' Hubble Photon wavelength:
[tex]r_u = \lambda_{\gamma}[/tex]
[tex]\lambda_{\gamma} = \frac{3 c}{H_o}[/tex]

What is the 'wavelength' of this photon?

Reference:
http://universe-review.ca/F02-cosmicbg.htm
http://universe-review.ca/R02-16-universe.htm
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Huh? That makes no sense at all... unless you are trying to prove 2 = 3.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I'm a bit confused about the relevance here. Why are you talking about this in terms of the longest photon wavelength?
 
  • #14
Agreed, ST. I fail to see the relevance, which is the basis of my objection.
 
  • #15
One could approach the OP's question as some kind of 'what if?' thought exploration; most posts in the thread are of this kind.

Or one could approach this in terms of physical possibilities, within what we know of physics, the universe, etc.

Or one could simply go outside and count the horse's teeth :smile:

On the second approach. Leave aside how the longest wavelength EM (radio?) might be created, could they 'exist', in any meaningful sense? For starters, the propagation of long wavelength (low frequency) radio is limited by the plasma frequency, which is proportional to the square root of the electron density. So, the universe seems to set a low frequency bound on radio waves which can propagation, to the lowest density plasma. And where are these plasmas? What are their densities?

Is there an 'out'? Are the large regions of space which are NOT plasmas (or, more precisely, do not contain free electrons)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K