The Contour Rule for Inverse Mellin Transforms

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoplite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Transform
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the contour rule for inverse Mellin transforms, focusing on the conditions for the value of the contour parameter \( c \) in the context of the Mellin transform. Participants explore the relationship between the Mellin and Laplace transforms, particularly regarding analyticity and convergence in the inverse transform.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the formula for the inverse Mellin transform and questions the appropriate value of \( c \) for the contour.
  • Another participant explains that \( c \) should be chosen such that \( F(s) \) is analytic, defining a vertical strip of analyticity, and discusses the relationship between Mellin and Laplace transforms.
  • A later reply clarifies that both integrals involved in the Mellin transform must be analytic within the vertical strip, emphasizing the importance of the contour's placement.
  • Several participants express a lack of familiarity with the Mellin transform and request help with specific exercises related to it.
  • There are multiple requests for solutions to exercises involving the Mellin transform of specific functions, indicating a need for assistance in understanding the application of the transform.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for the contour to lie within a vertical strip of analyticity for the Mellin transform, but there is no consensus on the specific applications or solutions to the exercises posed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the Mellin transform and its applications, indicating a potential gap in understanding or experience with the topic.

Who May Find This Useful

Students preparing for exams involving transforms, individuals seeking clarification on the properties of Mellin transforms, and those interested in the relationship between Mellin and Laplace transforms.

Hoplite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
To invert the Mellin transformed function F(s), the equation is,
[tex]f(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} x^{-s}F(s)ds[/tex]
What is the rule the value of c? I know that in inverse Laplace Transforms, c is any real number large enough that all the residues of F(s) lie to the left of the contour on the complex plane, but this is not necessarially the case with Mellin Transforms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c is such that F(s) is analytic and typically defines a "vertical strip" of analyticity. The Mellin transform is essentially a two sided Laplace transform. In the latter case, the (Laplace) transform exists if the function being transformed is "of exponential order" meaning that Re(s) > b (some number so contour is to the right of all the poles) has to be sufficiently large to provide convergence in the inverse transform. How large Re(s) has to be depends on the particular function under consideration.

One way to look at it is if we "reversed" the Laplace transform (i.e. consider only negative t) then the situation would be reversed and the inverse would exist if Re(s) < a (again, some number so the contour is the left of all the poles) has to be sufficiently large for convergence.

The Mellin transform essentially merges these two idea and has a "strip of analyticity" a < Re(s) < b.

I don't know what your application is but you may want to look at Bleistein and Handlesman (Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals) for a brief summary of the properties (I think it's now available as a Dover edition).
 
Last edited:
Ahhhh, thanks Tide. I understand now that we need both of [tex]\int_{0}^{1}x^{s-1}f(x)dx[/tex] and [tex]\int_{1}^{\infty}x^{s-1}f(x)dx[/tex] to be analytic within a vertical strip, and we run the contour through there.

(As it happens, I don't have a specific application in mind, but I have an exam coming up involving transforms.)
 
Glad to be of help - good luck on your exam!
 
hi.I m not familier with this transform.and I have exercise,I can not solve them could you help me?

M[(exp(x)+1)-¹]=?


M[(exp(x)-1)-¹]=?
 
hi.I m not familier with this transform.and I have exercise,I can not solve them could you help me?

M[(exp(x)+1)-¹]=?


M[(exp(x)-1)-¹]=?
 
hi,any one can solve my question?

M[(exp(x)-1)^(-1)]=?
 
did you resolve M[(exp(x)+1)-¹]?
I m curious about the solution.
Thanks
 
hi,yes,I can solve one of them,any one couldn't solve one of them?!
 
  • #10
Can you post your solution to post any of them.
I tried résolve one but i don't found.
Thank to post your solution.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K