PDA

View Full Version : impact factor of physics journals


Erdem
Nov28-03, 05:58 PM
how it is calculated.
what is the ranking of physics journals in 2003

sdeliver645
Dec13-03, 09:47 PM
Impact factors are calculated based mostly on number of citations. There are, however, many other factors. Do a google search on "ISI Journal Impact Factors" or "Journal Performance Indicators" and you can pull up some formulas that the ISI uses.

Regarding the actual impact factors, it depends on the area of physics. Areas available are:

Applied
Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
Condensed Matter
Fluids & Plasmas
Mathematical
Multidisciplenary
Nuclear
Particles & Fields

Here is some info. for 2002:

Top five ranked impact factor "Applied Physics" journals:
Mat Sci Eng R - 11.893
Adv Func Mater - 4.656
Appl Phys Lett - 4.207
MRS Bull - 3.242
J Appl Phys - 2.281

And the top six ranked impact factor "Atomic..." journals:
Prog Nucl Mag Res SP - 4.808
Adv Atom Mol Opt Phy - 4.524
Chem Phys Chem - 3.862
Atom Data Nucl Data - 3.737
J Chem Phys - 2.998
Phys Rev A - 2.986

Top five "Condensed Matter ..." journals:
Adv Phys - 13.952
Solid State Phys - 6.600
Adv Funct Mater - 4.656
Prog Surf Sci - 4.096
Phys Rev B - 3.327

suyver
Dec15-03, 03:18 AM
Amazing that Phys. Rev. Lett. didn't make it into any of these top-5 lists!

sdeliver645
Dec15-03, 12:13 PM
I was wondering the same thing.

In the physics community, what is considered "high impact" is, as I am sure you would corroberate, different than what ISI considers to be "high impact" with its algorithm.

hossi
May2-07, 03:03 PM
Reg PRL, coincidentally I just found this

Top Ten Most-Cited Journals (All Fields), 1996-2006


http://www.in-cites.com/research/2006/november_20_2006-1.html

ZapperZ
May2-07, 04:30 PM
Wow. It only took 4 years to follow up on this.

Zz.

moose
May2-07, 05:03 PM
Reg PRL, coincidentally I just found this

Top Ten Most-Cited Journals (All Fields), 1996-2006


http://www.in-cites.com/research/2006/november_20_2006-1.html

How is this a coincidence? I wouldn't call two events separated by 3 and a half years coinciding.

Art
May2-07, 05:05 PM
How is this a coincidence? I wouldn't call two events separated by 3 and a half years coinciding.It's all relative :biggrin:

Mind you - got to give credit for tenacity, to spend nearly 4 years researching an answer to the original question shows true persistence.

franznietzsche
May2-07, 08:55 PM
Say no to necroposting. I mean really, its just bad karma.