What is the Entropy Change in Cooling Aluminum from 373K to 333.45K?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmcgraw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the entropy change of aluminum as it cools from 373K to 333.45K. The specific heat of aluminum is provided, and the mass is noted, but the focus is on the entropy change calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the entropy change using heat transfer equations and integration, but expresses confusion over the results. Some participants suggest alternative integration methods, questioning the approach taken by the original poster.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods for integrating to find the entropy change. There is no consensus on the correct approach yet, but suggestions for alternative integration techniques have been provided, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations yield a significantly different result than expected, prompting questions about the integration method used. There may be assumptions about the heat transfer process that are being examined.

jmcgraw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I know the final and initial temperatures of .259kg of aluminum. Specific heat of almuninum is 900 J/(kg*K).

The aluminum is cooled from 373K to 333.45K. I need to find the entropy change. This is what I did:

let c = specific heat, m = mass, T = final temperature

Q = cm(T - 373) <=> Q = Tcm - 373cm <=> T = Q/cm + 373

Now that I had T in terms of Q, I subsituted it into the entropy integral:

delta S = [integral from initial heat to final heat] (Q/cm + 373) dQ

Initial heat lost is cm(373K-373K) = 0, final amount of heat lost is cm(333.45K-373K) = -9219 J

My integration yielded -3.256 x 10^6 J/K. The right answer should be only around -20 j/k or so. I am WAY off, but my approach seems like it should work.

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you integrate dQ/T , instead of T dQ , you might get closer to 25 J/K
 


:smile:
 
The only problem is that it gives a horrible integral (partial fraction decomposition? :cry: )

This is much better:

dQ =cmdT

so integrate

cm [integral from initial temp to final temp] dT/T

Ahhhhhhh... How much nicer. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K