How can hydrogen and lead crystals be differentiated through x-ray diffraction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating hydrogen and lead crystals using x-ray diffraction, despite them having the same crystal structure and lattice constant. Participants explore the implications of atomic scattering factors and their effects on diffraction patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differences in atomic scattering factors and how they influence the intensity and angles of diffraction. Questions are raised about qualitative explanations suitable for test conditions without access to tables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between atomic form factors and scattering intensity. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with no explicit consensus reached on the qualitative explanation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of a test environment where access to tables of scattering factors is not permitted, which may affect the depth of explanation available.

painfive
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I was given the following question: A crystal of hydrogen atoms and a crystal of lead atoms have exactly the same crystal structure, including lattice constant. How can they be distinguished by x-ray diffraction? The solutions say that the beams diffracted off the lead crystal would be much brighter, but those diffracted off hydrogen would scatter to larger angles. Can anyone explain why this is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The atomic scattering factors are different. The scattered intensity depends on the scattering factor squared at a given magnitude of the scattering vector (or angle). I didn't check but if you check the tabulated values for the scattering factor for H and Pb I'm pretty sure you'll see behaviour that explains this in them.
 
Is there a more qualitative way to explain it? This was a question on a test, so we wouldn't have had access to any tables.
 
Tell me if this sounds right. The atomic form factor, which is basically the Fourier transform of the charge density of a single atom, determines the magnitude of the refractions. If the incoming wave vector is k and the refracted wave vector is k', then the magnitude squared of the form factor evaluated at k-k' gives the intensity. So for lead, the charge distribution is more spread out, but larger in magnitude, so the form factor will be more localized and larger in magnitude than for hydrogen. So small k-k', corresponding to small Bragg angles, will scatter with more intensity off lead, but since the form factor is more localized, the refractions will not extend to as large a Bragg angle as those for hydrogen.
 
Last edited:
That seems ok to me. Magnitude of charge distribution could use rephrasing though. I know what you mean by it but I don't think the magnitude of a distribution really means anything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K