Is Every Field and Ring Homomorphism Injective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Ring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of ring and field homomorphisms, specifically focusing on the injectivity of a ring homomorphism from a field to a ring under certain conditions. The original poster presents a scenario where a homomorphism satisfies f(0) != f(1) and questions the implications of this condition on injectivity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the original poster's proof regarding injectivity, with some questioning the validity of the reasoning that leads to the conclusion that every homomorphism is injective. Others discuss the nature of kernels in field homomorphisms and the uniqueness of non-zero elements in fields.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining the assumptions made in the original proof and questioning the logic applied. Some have pointed out potential circular reasoning, while others are exploring the properties of fields that may influence the injectivity of homomorphisms.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the characteristics of fields and their ideals, as well as the implications of the kernel of a homomorphism being trivial or not. Participants are also considering the specific conditions under which the homomorphism operates, such as the relationship between zero and non-zero elements in fields.

Icebreaker
"Let F be a field and let f:F->R be a ring homomorphism satisfying f(0) != f(1). Show that f is necessarily injective."

Assume f(a)=f(b), then f(a)-f(b)=0R => f(a-b)=0R. f(0F)=0R and therefore a=b.
But this implies that every homomorphism is injective. How can that be?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It at best implies every *field* homomorphism is either the zero map or an injection. This is not surprising: the kernel of a ring homomorphism (so in particular a field homomorphism) is an ideal, but fields have no nontrivial ideals thus the kernel is either trivial or all of the field.

However your proof doesn't show even that.

How did you deduce that f(a-b)=0 implies a-b=0?
 
It appears I assumed f is injective to begin with; circular logic, I'm afraid.
 
Suppose f(x)=0, and x is not zero. What is special about fields (or any division algebras) in respect of non-zero elements in the field?
 
Let a' denote the multiplicative inverse of a. Since F is a field, f(aa')=f(a)f(a')=f(1). By hypothesis, f(1)!=f(0)=0R. Therefore, f(a) and f(a') are non-zero. So ker(f)={0F}. By theorem (6.12), f is injective.

The image of f is by def surjective. Therefore the image of f is isomorphic to F. I think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K