How Do Diamagnetism and Paramagnetism Relate to Lenz's Law?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between diamagnetism, paramagnetism, and Lenz's Law. Participants explore the behavior of materials in magnetic fields, particularly how diamagnetic materials oppose applied magnetic fields while paramagnetic materials align with them. The conversation seeks to clarify the connection to Lenz's Law and its implications in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that paramagnetic materials align their dipoles with an external magnetic field, while diamagnetic materials orient their dipoles in opposition to the field.
  • One participant asserts that Lenz's Law causes diamagnetic materials to line up their spins opposite to an increasing magnetic field to reduce the net field inside the material, though they acknowledge this as a non-explanatory argument.
  • Another participant argues against dismissing Lenz's Law as merely a "hand-waving" argument, emphasizing its mathematical formulation and connection to conservation of energy and Maxwell's equations.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about Lenz's Law and suggests a connection to molecular orbital structures and the pairing of electrons in outer orbitals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of Lenz's Law and its implications, with some emphasizing its rigorous mathematical basis while others question the clarity of the explanations provided. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise relationship between Lenz's Law and the magnetic properties of materials.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the explanations provided, particularly regarding the assumptions about the mechanisms behind diamagnetism and paramagnetism, as well as the specific definitions of terms used in the discussion.

apiri
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Simple question, kind of. I know that paramagnetic materials, when in the presence of a magnetic field will have its dipoles orient with the field while diamagnetic materials when introduced to a magnetic field orient opposite to the field. I've read that this has something to do with Lentz's Law, but is there someone that could help put this in slightly better perspective?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
apiri said:
Simple question, kind of. I know that paramagnetic materials, when in the presence of a magnetic field will have its dipoles orient with the field while diamagnetic materials when introduced to a magnetic field orient opposite to the field. I've read that this has something to do with Lentz's Law, but is there someone that could help put this in slightly better perspective?

http://www.cmp.liv.ac.uk/frink/thesis/thesis/node35.html
 
Lenz's law makes things oppose the change of applied field. So when a diamagnetric material experiences and increasing field, it lines up its spins in the opposite direction to reduce the net field inside the material. This is not really an explanation. More of a hand-waving argument.
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
Lenz's law makes things oppose the change of applied field. So when a diamagnetric material experiences and increasing field, it lines up its spins in the opposite direction to reduce the net field inside the material. This is not really an explanation. More of a hand-waving argument.

I don't think we can dismiss Lenz's law simply as "hand-waving". For one, it has a very detailed mathematical formulation. This implies it makes quantitative description and predictions. Hand-waving arguments very seldom have that.

It is also a direct consequence of the conservation of energy. Now that principle is certainly not hand-waving.

It is also from one of Maxwell's equations. So it is part of a well-established formulation of classical E&M.

What you might have wanted to say was that it is a phenomenology, which I have no arguments with. Classical E&M, as per Maxwell equations, is really phenomenology - none of those equations can be derived from classical First Principles formulations. Coulomb's law, for example, was not derived - it is a description of a phenomena.

[I purposely did not bring QED into this.]

Zz.
 
I never meant that Lenz's Law was a hand waving argument. I was talking about mine. My argument didn't explain what made a certain material diamagnetic.
 
i forget what lenz's law is. But wouldn't it have to do with the molecular orbital and if the outer orbital of a molecular orbital structure was paired or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K