Point charge placed in the vicinity of two plates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of induced charges on two conducting plates when a point charge +Q is placed between them. Participants explore the implications of charge distribution and the method of images in electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the charge induced on the second plate based on the charge on the first plate and question how the presence of two plates alters the charge distribution compared to a single plate scenario. There is also exploration of the relationship between the induced charge and the position of the point charge.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the method of images and the nature of induced charges, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their understanding and the implications of charge distribution. The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of distance between the point charge and the plates, as well as the sequence of introducing the plates into the system. There is a mention of a diagram that aids in visualizing the problem.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hello all..

Here's a question I need some help with...

A point charge +Q has been placed between two infinitely large conducting plates. The charge induced on the surface of the first plate is [itex]q_{1}[/itex]. What should be the charge induced on the surface of the second? (Diagram attached; the charge is closer to the left plate)

(A) [itex]-(q_1 + Q)[/itex]
(B) [itex]Q[/itex]
(C) [itex]-(q_1 - Q)[/itex]
(D) None

(Correct answer = A)

If we had just one plate, then the induced charge on the side facing the charge would be -Q. But what happens if we bring another plate as well? How does the charge distribution change?

I am not sure if the "correct" answer is indeed correct.

Thanks for your help...

Cheers
Vivek
 

Attachments

  • figure.gif
    figure.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 652
Physics news on Phys.org
You can solve the problem of a single point charge outside a conducting plate using the method of images, specifically with one image charge. For a point charge between two conducting plates, you can again use images but you have to use an infinite number of image charges. A solution is therefore possible, but that isn't really relevant for the problem.

In the case of a single conducting plane with a point charge outside it, the conducting plane acquires a charge that has the same magnitude but opposite sign to the point charge, right? So if you know that one conducting plate has a charge of [tex]q_1[/tex] and there is also a point charge of [tex]Q[/tex], how much charge would you expect to be drawn up on the second conducting plate? Hint: how would a single conducting plate respond to an arbitrary given charge distribution outside it?
 
Hi

Thanks! I get it now. I don't believe how I missed that.

My only problem with that line of reasoning was whether the induced charge is to be treated like a real charge as much as the actual point charge sitting between the plates. But I guess the induced charge as as much real as the point charge to all points in space, in particular, those on the plate.

But shouldn't [itex]q_{1} = -Q[/itex]?

Also, if we assume this charging process to be made up of two steps: in the first one, we bring the (left) first plate in the vicinity of the point charge. Once we've done that, images (and sheer common sense) tell us that the induced charge on the right face of this plate equals [itex]-Q[/itex]. Now we bring in the second plate and place it at the location shown in the diargam. Does the charge distribution on the left plate get affected by the presence of the plate on the right?

[PS: My 700th post! Yay!]
 
Yes, the induced charge is very real, it is "drawn up from infinity" if you like. However, [tex]q_1 \neq - Q[/tex], and in fact what [tex]q_1[/tex] is depends on the distance of [tex]Q[/tex] from the conducting plate. For instance, it should be clear from symmetry that if [tex]Q[/tex] is halfway between the plates then [tex]q_1 = -Q/2[/tex] and [tex]q_2 = -(q_1 + Q) = - Q /2[/tex].

This should answer you second question as well. Clearly the right plate has to effect the charge on the left plate. Let's imagine for simplicity that I am going to bring the right plate in from infinity so as to have the charge [tex]Q[/tex] halfway between the plates. The initial condition is of course [tex]q_1 = - Q[/tex] as you say. As you bring the right plate in from infinity, it is always closer to the charge [tex]Q[/tex] than to the left conducting plate therefore some charge will be induced on it. However, it is then clear that this charge (which will be negative) will also affect the charge on left plate (reducing it). The final result is [tex]-Q/2[/tex] on each plate in the case of [tex]Q[/tex] midway between them.
 
Last edited:
Thanks again. Sorry for the delayed response...I need to digest what you've said before (if need be) I post another reply to this thread.

Cheers
Vivek
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K