Physics Forums (http://www.physicsforums.com/index.php)
-   Classical Physics (http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   conflict in AC electricity (http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=667601)

 klmnopq Jan28-13 03:12 PM

conflict in AC electricity

helllo ALLLLLL

my question
in Ac single phase without earth

only one phase live and one neutral

why we say that live line would kill but neutral won't kill

isn't neutral carry current for return "same live current"

 Drakkith Jan28-13 04:31 PM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Since the current oscillates directions at the frequency of your power supply, both wires carry current at all times. I believe the "neutral" wire is simply a distinction to label the wires differently. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

 Ryoko Jan28-13 05:23 PM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

The neutral wire is tied to ground.

 berkeman Jan28-13 05:25 PM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by klmnopq (Post 4246973) helllo ALLLLLL my question in Ac single phase without earth only one phase live and one neutral why we say that live line would kill but neutral won't kill isn't neutral carry current for return "same live current"
By code (at least in the US), the Neutral wire is Earth grounded at the breaker panel. So there is very little voltage developed between the Neutral wires and grounded metal surfaces. The Hot lead is carring the full AC Mains voltage, and both the Hot and Neutral wires carry the current to the load from the source distribution transformer.

The usual risk from electric shock is from a "ground fault". That is, when you are touching some grounded piece of metal, and you come in contact with the Hot wire. That's bad. But if you are in contact with a grounded metal surface, and you come in contact with an exposed Neutral wire, you will only experience a few volts of AC voltage at most, which you will likely not even feel.

 mickybob Jan29-13 05:43 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by klmnopq (Post 4246973) helllo ALLLLLL my question in Ac single phase without earth only one phase live and one neutral why we say that live line would kill but neutral won't kill isn't neutral carry current for return "same live current"

It's possible you might be suffering from a couple of common misconceptions. The first is that that the absolute 'voltage' matters. It doesn't. All we care about is the difference in potential (the potential difference or 'voltage') between two wires, points etc.

The second is that wires somehow 'carry' a fixed current. Current flows between two points where there there is a potential difference and sufficiently low resistance. That why we only care about the potential difference, not absolute voltages.

In a single phase AC supply, the potential difference between the 'live' wire and 'neutral' oscillates between (for example) around +340 and -340 V in Europe. So if you connect them together via, say a motor, there is a potential difference and current flows (in this case an alternating current).

The 'neutral' wire is earthed, so is at the same voltage (roughly) as you. So if you touch the neutral wire, nothing happens as there is no potential difference and hence no current flow.

The live wire varies between +340 and -340 V relative to the neutral wire. So there is a large potential difference between you and the wire - if you touch it, bang!

 rollingstein Jan29-13 06:02 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by berkeman (Post 4247158) By code (at least in the US), the Neutral wire is Earth grounded at the breaker panel. So there is very little voltage developed between the Neutral wires and grounded metal surfaces.
If Neutral gets tied to Earth what's the purpose of the third grounding pin / wire that's sometimes found?

 Studiot Jan29-13 06:39 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Hello mickybob, Berkeman is quite correct, the building neutral is earthed by code in the US.

This is not the case in Europe, where it is illegal to earth the neutral.

This is because the two distributions system work entirely differently.

Hello rollingstein.

The neutral in both systems carries the return current.

The aditional earth in both systems should carry zero current in normal operation. It's sole purpose is for safety protection, in which case it carries a fault current, sufficient to blow the fuse or breaker. It also serves to prevent hazardous potentials developing on exposed metalwork.

Edit:
Hello ,klmnopq

mickybob is on the right lines, the actual current flowing in the wires does not present the danger. It is the voltage difference between yourself and something else.
The power company maintains the neutral at somewhere near earth potential (mine is often about 30 volts) and the phase at line voltage above that. It is this potential difference the delivers the electrical power to your appliances.

You are also at approximately earth voltage so if you touch the neutral of the supply wire you are probably safe, but don't try it to see.

If, however your supply is from a (portable) generator then you will get a belt off either terminal. Neither terminal of a portable generator is maintained near earth, without further intervention.

Remember safety first, second and last.

 mickybob Jan29-13 06:43 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by Studiot (Post 4247961) Hello mickybob, Berkman is quite correct, the building neutral is earthed by code in the US. This is not the case in Europe, where it is illegal to earth the neutral. This is because the two distributions system work entirely differently. Hello rollingstein. The neutral in both systems carry the return current. The aditional earth isn both systems should carry zero current in normal operation. It's sole purpose is for safety protection, in which case it carries a fault current, sufficient to blow the fuse or breaker. It also serves to prevent hazardous potentials developing on exposed metalwork.
Yes, but it's earthed the other side of the circuit breaker/fuse box. Which is a crucial difference under fault conditions.

 russ_watters Jan29-13 06:44 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

I'm not sure these answers really answer the question. The key, to me, is that the neutral wire comes after the load in the circuit, so the voltage is essentially zero, regardless of if/where it is tied to the ground.

 mickybob Jan29-13 06:50 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by russ_watters (Post 4247969) I'm not sure these answers really answer the question. The key, to me, is that the neutral wire comes after the load in the circuit, so the voltage is essentially zero, regardless of if/where it is tied to the ground.
What do you mean by voltage? Voltage is a difference in potential between two points, if you'er saying the voltage is zero, do you mean the potential difference between that point and ground is zero. In which case it's the same as saying it's tied to ground.

The key point is that the p.d. is zero because it is tied to ground. This is irrelevant of whether there is a load or not.

 Studiot Jan29-13 06:52 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Yes, but it's earthed the other side of the circuit breaker/fuse box. Which is a crucial difference under fault conditions.
No, this is illegal.

 Studiot Jan29-13 07:25 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

If the neutral naturally rests at approximately zero in relation to earth as Russ suggested, or if it is tied to earth as mickybob suggested, then how come my neutral is usually about 30 volts under no fault conditions.

Many folks will have seen a neon tester light when touched to a neutral. The striking voltage of a neon is about 70 volts.

Finally why do you get a belt from the 'neutral' terminal of a portable generator if it naturally rests near earth?

Quote:
The OP is fully answered in my post#7 edit which was being composed whilst Russ was posting.

 mickybob Jan29-13 07:47 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by Studiot (Post 4248004) If the neutral naturally rests at approximately zero in relation to earth as Russ suggested, or if it is tied to earth as mickybob suggested, then how come my neutral is usually about 30 volts under no fault conditions.
You'd expect a small voltage drop, but 30 V seems pretty dangerously highly. Is that under load?

 klmnopq Jan29-13 07:49 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

sorry friends

I got more worried

we difference between

1-single phase 2 wire
not as USA and has only 2 wires for current & return??

IN AC current alternate so, Isn't neutral must carrry current &therefore not safe

2-single phase 3 wire

as in USA there is 3 wires and there is the same problem

 klmnopq Jan29-13 07:50 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

is it mean eath carry current for return !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in case of who say return is grounded

how current return into supply!!!

 russ_watters Jan29-13 07:59 AM

Quote:
 Quote by mickybob (Post 4247973) What do you mean by voltage? Voltage is a difference in potential between two points, if you'er saying the voltage is zero, do you mean the potential difference between that point and ground is zero. In which case it's the same as saying it's tied to ground. The key point is that the p.d. is zero because it is tied to ground. This is irrelevant of whether there is a load or not.
I know it is tied to ground, but it doesn't have to be for this to be true.

Neutral and ground are tied together to ensure exactly zero potential between them, but even if they weren't, there would still be close to zero because the load is in between the neutral and the voltage source.

 mickybob Jan29-13 08:32 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
 Quote by klmnopq (Post 4248028) sorry friends I got more worried we difference between 1-single phase 2 wire not as USA and has only 2 wires for current & return?? IN AC current alternate so, Isn't neutral must carrry current &therefore not safe 2-single phase 3 wire as in USA there is 3 wires and there is the same problem
The debate has got a bit side-tracked, so lets go back to the 'physics' of your question which I'm sure we'll all agree on. Firstly - please re-read my first post - I think you have some basic misunderstandings.

'Dangerous' means current flowing through you, not through a wire.

You are standing on the ground, then to a reasonable approximation you are grounded, i.e. at what we usually call 0 V. This will be a better approximation if you stand in a pool of water.

The live wire is at, for example, 240 V relative to ground.

The neutral wire is at (give or take) 0 V relative to ground.

If you touch the live wire, there will be a 240 V potential difference between your hand and your feet and hence ground. Your resistance is not that high, so a big current will flow and you'll probably die.

If you touch the neutral wire, there will be (in principle) a 0 V potential difference between your hand and your feet - nothing will happen.

There is a voltage drop of 240 V across the 'load' - this can be your TV or, if nothing is plugged in, air.

If it's your TV, then there is a relatively low resistance, and so there is a current running through the live wire, across the load, through the neutral wire and back into the supply. If the 'load' is air (nothing is plugged in) then the resistance is huge and the current running along this path is essentially zero.

Either way, it doesn't matter - only a current running through you is dangerous and that depends on the voltage drop across you (and your resistance).

Having said all that, in practice things might be slightly more complicated, and I wouldn't suggest you still metal objects in the neutral plug.

 rollingstein Jan29-13 08:35 AM

Re: conflict in AC electricity

Quote:
That's a good explanation. But why is there a separate ground and neutral wire then in some cases?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.