Register to reply

Charge Conjugation and Internal Symmetry Representations

Share this thread:
Feb12-12, 08:25 PM
P: 1
Hi All,
I am trying to work through a QFT problem for independent study and I can't quite get my head around it. It is 5.16 from Tom Bank's book ( which goes as follows:

"Show that charge conjugation symmetry implies that the representation of the internal symmetry group G is real or pseudo-real." (I think we only need to deal with scalar fields here but I don't know that it matters.)

The book linked to above has more details on pages 50-52. I am am pretty confused but I think that I need to show that the representation [itex]R_S[/itex] is not complex if C-symmetry exists. That is to show that [itex]R_s^\dagger=U^\dagger R_s U[/itex]. (i.e. unitary equivalence) is implied by C-symmetry on scalar fields.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
How did evolution optimize circadian clocks?
New webcast series brings cutting-edge physics talks to the world
High Flux Isotope Reactor named Nuclear Historic Landmark

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Representations of Symmetry Operators Quantum Physics 5
What changes under charge conjugation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 4
Charge Conjugation Operation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 6
Help! About charge conjugation of Dirac spinor Quantum Physics 1
Help about the charge conjugation of Dirac spinor High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0