| New Reply |
Not sure which formula to use! Deals with work and position |
Share Thread |
| Mar9-12, 01:18 PM | #1 |
|
|
Not sure which formula to use! Deals with work and position
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
A one-dimensional force acts on a particle of mass m = 6.26 kg in such a way that its position is given by: x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t Find W, the work done by this force during the first 1.49 s. 2. Relevant equations F=mg F=ma W=F*distance 3. The attempt at a solution To find the distance, I plugged in 1.49 into the formula they gave, and I got (-48.5). I know that to find work, the formula is W=F*s, so in order to find the force, I'm not sure which formula to use. I think I should be using F=ma, and to find the acceleration, I can take the second derivative of the given formula. However, I forget whether that is allowed in one-dimension. If not, then do I use F=mg? If I use F=mg, then the answer for work will come out positive. If I use F=ma, then the work comes out negative. Here are my results: W=Fs W=ma*s W=6.26*18.18*(-48.5) W=(-5519.6)J W=Fs W=mg*s W=6.26*(-9.81)*(-48.5) W=2978.4 J |
| Mar9-12, 01:38 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Gravity is not involved in this. It would cause a constant acceleration and a distance formula of s = Vi*t + .5*a*t² rather than the cubic formula of this problem. |
| Mar9-12, 01:39 PM | #3 |
|
|
hi iJamJL!
![]() and yes the acceleration is the second derviative, even in three dimensions! ![]() (what is worrying you about that? )but W = F*s only works if F is constant here, F isn't constant, so you would have to use W = ∫ F.ds however it might be simpler to use the work-energy theorem, and calculate the difference in kinetic energy |
| Mar9-12, 01:57 PM | #4 |
|
|
Not sure which formula to use! Deals with work and position
Thanks for the replies!
To find the final velocity, which for this case is at 1.49s, we take the first derivative at 1.49: x = 0.484t3 - 33.6t dx/dt= 2*(.484)t^2 - 33.6 v= (-30.38)m/s W=ΔKE W= 1/2*m(v-final^2) - 1/2*m(v-initial^2) **v-initial is 0 because t=0, x=0** W=1/2*6.26*(-30.38)^2 W=2888.8 J I tried entering that into my online homework system and it came out wrong. The system doesn't really care for the form that the answer is, as long as there are 3 significant digits. That means that I solved for this incorrectly!
|
| Mar9-12, 02:03 PM | #5 |
|
|
… 3*t2
|
| Mar9-12, 02:26 PM | #6 |
|
|
My end result came to: v=(.484)*3*(1.49^2) - 33.6 =(-30.4)m/s W=1/2*m*v^2 W=1/2*6.26*(-30.4^2) W=2892.6 J That's still coming out as incorrect. |
| Mar9-12, 03:07 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
| Mar9-12, 03:18 PM | #8 |
|
Recognitions:
|
|
| Mar9-12, 03:19 PM | #9 |
|
|
v(0)=(-33.6)m/s v(1.49)=(-30.4)m/s W=1/2*m*(v2^2) - 1/2*m*(v1^2) W=1/2*6.26(-30.4^2) - 1/2*6.26*(-33.6^2) W=2892.6 - 3533.6 W=(-641) J Did I finally get the correct answer?
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Not sure which formula to use! Deals with work and position
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Position angle of Moon's bright limb (formula) | General Astronomy | 5 | ||
| Amount of work that is done to adjust the capacitor from position A to position B | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| net work formula, do you know it | Advanced Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| Quick question on a simplification of position formula | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 1 | ||
| work problem, deals with great pyramid | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||