Euler angles and angular velocity


by Curl
Tags: angles, angular, euler, velocity
Curl
Curl is offline
#1
Apr16-12, 08:49 PM
P: 751
How do you prove that angular velocity is just the time derivative of each Euler angle times the basis vector of its respective frame?
I remember it used to be perfectly clear to me a while back, but now I don't remember how the result was derived, and I couldn't find it in any of my books I looked so far.
Does anyone remember how the result was derived?

Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
I like Serena
I like Serena is offline
#2
Apr17-12, 11:40 AM
HW Helper
I like Serena's Avatar
P: 6,189
Hi Curl!

Each euler angle is measured in a plane through the origin.
In other words, one specific Euler angle behaves exactly as if it was a 2 dimensional polar coordinate.
If an angle changes by an amount ##d\phi## in an time interval ##dt##, the position changes by ##r d\phi##.
In other words:
$$\frac{ds}{dt}=\frac{r d\phi}{dt}=r \frac{d\phi}{dt} = r \omega$$
Curl
Curl is offline
#3
Apr17-12, 09:16 PM
P: 751
the problem I have is that in order to add the 3 angular velocity vectors (one in each frame) implies that the rotation can be represented as the sum of the three individual rotations. But rotation order matters, which makes things confusing.

D H
D H is online now
#4
Apr17-12, 11:02 PM
Mentor
P: 14,462

Euler angles and angular velocity


Exactly. The time derivatives of a set of Euler angles (better said: Tait-Bryan angles, Bryan angles, or Cardan angles; Euler angles are a z-x-z rotation) are not angular velocity.
FeX32
FeX32 is offline
#5
Apr18-12, 01:22 AM
P: 67
How do you prove that angular velocity is just the time derivative of each Euler angle times the basis vector of its respective frame?
I think you mean the 'cross product', not times.
FeX32
FeX32 is offline
#6
Apr18-12, 01:38 AM
P: 67
Well that sentence is flawed actually.
Say you have a vector [itex] A=A_x\hat{i}+A_y\hat{j}+A_z\hat{z} [/itex] in a Cartesian frame. Knowledge of its velocity in this frame is obtained through its time derivative. This yields
[tex]
\frac{d\hat{A}}{dt}=\frac{dA_x}{dt}\hat{i}+\frac{dA_y}{dt}\hat{j}+\frac {dA_z}{dt}\hat{z}
[/tex]
which can then be deduced to
[tex]
\frac{d\hat{A}}{dt}=\dot{A} \vec{A}+\vec{\omega} \times \vec{A}
[/tex]
In the above, [itex] \vec{\omega} [/itex] is what you call angular velocity.

Cheers,
FeX32
FeX32 is offline
#7
Apr18-12, 02:27 PM
P: 67
Oh jeeze. I came to check this just now and I realized I forgot one line. :)

Here it is:
[tex]
\frac{d\hat{A}}{dt}=\frac{dA_x}{dt}\hat{i}+\frac{d A_y}{dt}\hat{j}+\frac{dA_z}{dt}\hat{z}+\left( A_x \frac{d\hat{i}}{dt}+A_y\frac{d\hat{j}}{dt}+A_z \frac{d \hat{z}}{dt}\right)
[/tex]

Change this line in my above post. This can then deduce the last equation after realizing that the unit vectors have a fixed length.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
so (3) or su(2) and Euler angles Classical Physics 0
Angular velocity of a 3D rigid body with Eulerian Angles General Physics 3
Uniqueness of Euler angles Classical Physics 8
Euler angles components Calculus 2
euler angles Advanced Physics Homework 0